<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the new illegal immigration offensive about Miers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2005/10/19/is-the-new-illegal-immigration-offensive-about-miers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2005/10/19/is-the-new-illegal-immigration-offensive-about-miers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:47:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DL</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2005/10/19/is-the-new-illegal-immigration-offensive-about-miers/#comment-130397</link>
		<dc:creator>DL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 09:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2005/10/19/is-the-new-illegal-immigration-offensive-about-miers/#comment-130397</guid>
		<description>The answer to the headline is YES!

Bush is in trouble because of Miers. Many politicians will fall if this split isn&#039;t fixed, but  pure stubborness on the part of King George, means Miers wont be pulled unless and until the world falls in. The carrot and stick tone the Whitehouse is taking (read the Tucker Calson interview with one of the WH hacks) is not one of persuasion, but of attack, while the conservatives also get a nice bone to chew on hoping it distracts them.

Everything has been tried, including damaging the image of Bush&#039;s own wife by using her as a cheap attack dog .(you sexists anti-Miers pigs!)

This final  &quot;camels-straw&quot; if you will, has opened all the wounds conservatives have been carrying silently for the greater cause, one of which is the porous borders.
Nothing is more obvious than the fact that what is being announced now (not done-just promised like another &quot;Scalia&quot; was) about the borders could easily been announced anytime during Bush last four or five years.  It wasn&#039;t and wouldn&#039;t have been except for the fact that things have suddenly changed.

The change? Miers! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer to the headline is YES!</p>
<p>Bush is in trouble because of Miers. Many politicians will fall if this split isn&#8217;t fixed, but  pure stubborness on the part of King George, means Miers wont be pulled unless and until the world falls in. The carrot and stick tone the Whitehouse is taking (read the Tucker Calson interview with one of the WH hacks) is not one of persuasion, but of attack, while the conservatives also get a nice bone to chew on hoping it distracts them.</p>
<p>Everything has been tried, including damaging the image of Bush&#8217;s own wife by using her as a cheap attack dog .(you sexists anti-Miers pigs!)</p>
<p>This final  &#8220;camels-straw&#8221; if you will, has opened all the wounds conservatives have been carrying silently for the greater cause, one of which is the porous borders.<br />
Nothing is more obvious than the fact that what is being announced now (not done-just promised like another &#8220;Scalia&#8221; was) about the borders could easily been announced anytime during Bush last four or five years.  It wasn&#8217;t and wouldn&#8217;t have been except for the fact that things have suddenly changed.</p>
<p>The change? Miers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrSpkr</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2005/10/19/is-the-new-illegal-immigration-offensive-about-miers/#comment-129995</link>
		<dc:creator>MrSpkr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2005/10/19/is-the-new-illegal-immigration-offensive-about-miers/#comment-129995</guid>
		<description>Michelle Malkin believes the new &quot;get tough&quot; policy will apply only to illegal aliens who are OTM (&quot;Other Than Mexican), so it will not satisfy the base. who have been upset about illegal immigration for years (back into the 1980&#039;s) -- long before 9/11 made illegal immigration a national security hotbutton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michelle Malkin believes the new &#8220;get tough&#8221; policy will apply only to illegal aliens who are OTM (&#8220;Other Than Mexican), so it will not satisfy the base. who have been upset about illegal immigration for years (back into the 1980&#8242;s) &#8212; long before 9/11 made illegal immigration a national security hotbutton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
