In 2002 the Democratic Party got hitched up to the Bush administration on Iraq in a shotgun wedding, and they haven’t stopped complaining about it since. (The Senate vote was 29-21 for, and the House vote was 126-81 against, but the deed was done anyhow. Since then, the House Democrats apparently repented and reaffirmed their vows almost unanimously the other day, though the nag-in-chief instantly regretted it.) Why won’t they shut up already? But they don’t. Nag, nag, nag, that’s all that the Democrats and the MSM ever do.

There are too few troops; there are too many troops. The troops better be back before 11 o’clock. The troops aren’t wearing the right clothes or driving the right cars. The troops are bullies. The troops are poor rednecks.

And that Bush! What a good-for-nothing, lazy, spupid bumbler. Every idea he has is stupid — and mean. The man never worked an honest day in his life. And the boys he hangs around with: criminals every one.

The man has no taste, wearing boots and driving a pickup truck. Why can’t he be more like those nice neighbors down the street, Jacques and Dominique? Everybody likes them; nobody likes us.

Everything that Bush touches falls apart. He broke the levees. He broke the weather. He broke the economy the worst it’s been broke in 70 years — everything is too hot and too cold at the same time. He bankrupted the family. He didn’t spend enough money on his daughter Katrina. He spent too much on Rita, etc, etc, etc.

In real life, nagging is a classic co-dependent behavior, indicating that a person can’t stand on his own, independently, with his own ideas. He needs the other to react against. Need we point out that, in addition to being extremely annoying, nagging is the antithesis of leadership?

This entry was posted on Sunday, December 4th, 2005 at 8:44 am and is filed under business, Democrats, General, Left of Left, MSM, War. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.