Psychoanalysis and Islam
Preface
We would have preferred to read some source material rather than to write this, to have bought a few leading books from Amazon on the topic, and see what the blogosphere and academic debates said about them. That is our preferred approach to a new topic. Then we would have been better prepared to write. Perhaps it is our poor research skills, but we couldn’t find much about Frued, Jung or psycholoanalysis and Islam. So at the moment we are principally asking questions, of which a few follow.
Discussion
We recently wrote about the horror of Islam’s criminalizing apostasy, in part because criminalizing inquiry and doubt enslaves the mind. This led us to many thoughts: (a) what perverted concept of the self promotes suppressing and denying the most personal of doubts; (b) what does Islam think about Freud and psychoanalysis, which involves letting thoughts go where they will to reveal unconscious motivations; (c) is the fact that Arab culture is considered a ‘shame society’ (see Dr. Sanity) a related concept; (d) what pyschological costs are imposed by blaming negative or doubting or troubling thoughts on external forces — sin? Jews? money? modern life? media culture? oppression by others? uppity women? the Great Satan or the Little Satan? — instead of locating such thoughts and neuroses internally? (e) how do the severe punishments and executions for homosexuality, and the oppression of women fit into this picture? (e) is this twisted concept of the human psyche related in some significant sense to the penchant of Islamic boys to be attracted to the suicide aspect of suicide-bombing, perhaps as a way out of un-discussable problems?
Right now we are just asking questions. Certainly we can’t find any answers on the internet. If you Google Psychoanalysis – Islam, you get not much of interest, which is perhaps telling in itself. We did find a disturbing piece of writing at Islam Online from an Islamic therapist, Malik Babikir Badri:
When Freud developed his psycho-analytic school as theory for human behavior and a method of psycho-therapy he was greatly influenced by the anti religious secular movement of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century. As Christianity was demoted and the human soul was thrown over board a new kind of secular philosophy was very much needed to fill the vacuum created by the demotion of religion. From this point of view psychoanalysis was actually a philosophy and to some extremists a new religion. Young doctors who graduate as psychoanalysts will have to be psychoanalyzed themselves. This is a way of brainwashing them into a new worldview of a Freudian nature.
Since religion teaches that humans have souls and that they are responsible for what ever they do before God and that there is a here-after in which their actions will be judged, then they must have freedom of choice to either act in a good way or in an evil way. Freud demolished this conception and denied the existence of God, the soul, the here-after and human free will. In preaching his new secular conception of man he had to invent a new power which motivates humans to act in their environment. This new “god” is the unconscious. If man is motivated in what ever he does by unconscious forces then he does not have the freedom to choose. Since Freud postulated that the unconscious is propelled by sexual and aggressive impulses, the whole conception of sinful behavior and evil that religion teaches became challenged. One of the reasons why Freud was hailed by the western world at the time was because he gave Western societies a good justification for their emancipation from rigidity of Catholicism. However, psychoanalysis has deprived man from his rational conscious motivation….
I have always found that using this Islamically oriented cognitive therapy effective to bring about dramatic improvement in patients who failed to respond to psychiatric treatment with drugs or to psychoanalytic oriented therapy. In fact, many of my patients who had been psychoanalyzed deteriorated after psychoanalytic therapy or they were made to remember very painful incidence which increased their anxiety and feelings of worthlessness. It would have been better for them not to remember that unconscious material.
We find this writing, which seems to us to be rife with dishonesty, to be profoundly disturbing, since it seems to us that honesty is a sine qua non for being a good therapist. For example, his assertion that unconscious motivation deprives man of choice is ludicrous on its face. People choose to act in ways contrary to their wishes and desires, conscious and unconscious, every day. Why is this man lying? we ask. What is he trying to hide?
Moreover, this sounds to us like a man who is capable of doing great harm to his patients. He believes that patients would have been better served “not to remember that unconscious material,” those “incidence” [sic], that made them uncomfortable. Instead of letting his patients work through their conflicts, he apparently thinks Islam and his patients are better served by finding some way to avoid and paper over some serious issues. Perhaps Islam is indeed better served by doing so, but those troubled individual men and women most certainly are not.
Postscript
Though there is little written on Freud, pychoanalysis and Islam, there is plenty to read on the subject of Islam, human nature, and original sin. In one sense, Islam takes the position that it provides all the knowledge necessary for one to understand the self, and it does so through revelation:
The point of revelation is not to enforce a ‘system’, but to complement the human personality. Revelation was sent to remind men of their ultimate destiny and to regulate all those components (i.e. emotions, passions, hedonism and reason according to Moiz Amjad), that make up a human being so that he can achieve harmony in life. Without revelation, men tend to fall into extreme, whether it is through his own reason or heart. History is a testimony to this.
In this sense, asking about Freud and Islam is to get things backwards. Freud has little to add to the concept of the self and human nature, other than if he said to focus on the overall truth of man’s nature as revealed in Islam. Knowledge, including self-knowledge, is a comprehrensive concept in Islam, and depends first on accepting the truth of the religion in submission to the revelation of Allah:
In Islam ‘ilm [knowledge] is not confined to the acquisition of knowledge only, but also embraces socio-political and moral aspects. Knowledge is not mere information; it requires the believers to act upon their beliefs and commit themselves to the goals which Islam aims at attaining. In brief, I would like to say that the theory of knowledge in the Islamic perspective is not just a theory of epistemology. It combines knowledge, insight, and social action as its ingredients….not only the Qur’an and hadith encouraged Muslims or rather made it obligatory for them to pursue truth freely from all possible sources, but also contained certain guiding principles that could provide a secure foundation for the development of religious and secular sciences.
So what Freud was doing could only be ‘science’ if it assisted in shedding some light on what religion had already revealed to be true. So in Islam, mental illness is either something genetic or biological, or possession by an evil spirit, or a result of a defect — of straying from the true path given to man:
we can look at how different cultures understand mental illness, and certainly in Islamic culture there is way to understand this by explaning it as the result of sin, or some other supernatural phenomenon, like the sihr, hasad and the presence of jinn. In fact, the Arabic word for insane or crazy is “majnoon” which is related to the world “jinn.” So does being crazy in the Islamic perspective mean that one is possessed by the jinn? Yes, in some cases, you will find people making a traditional diagnosis like that, and usually these people are not locked up or medicated, as they would be in the West, but they are treated with the Qur’an. In another view, our own deeds come back to haunt us, so having committed a major sin can certainly make one feel out of touch, and even seek help, which in most cases would also be the Quran, and salat and dua.
For the last word in this rather depresing section, we will turn to Pakistan’s official views of mental health:
Mental health in Pakistan is an important issue and needs to be attended to with help from civil society, Punjab Special Education Minister Qudsia Lodhi told a conference on ‘Islam and Mental Health’ organised by the International Conference of Pakistan Association of Clinical Psychologists (PACP) in Lahore on Saturday.
“Solution to our problems lies in the teachings of Islam. We can achieve success and peace by following universal principles of our religion,” Ms Lodhi said.
The minister said Islamic laws stressed human relationships and urged Muslims to treat parents with kindness and love. Parents, she added, had similar responsibilities towards their children. “Rights of the relatives, orphans and neighbours are defined clearly in Islam. There is guidance also on how to treat your teachers, strangers or travellers. In fact, it all adds up to a charter of human rights. Even animal rights have been spelled,” she said.
Ms Lodhi said that since the parameters were already drawn, it made the job of a clinical psychologist relatively easier. She said the conference should focus on Islamic teachings…
We no longer wonder why there is not a lot of literature on Freud, psychoanalysis and Islam. All science must begin with free inquiry, which is based on observation and which certainly includes questioning all assumptions about ‘revealed’ knowledge or any other a priori assumption. Islam rejects such inquiry out of hand as a possible path to truth. Thus the explanation is in a way quite similar to the reason there are so few patents in the Islamic world. The entire process is suspect. Free association, like the passion to tinker and invent, can lead one away from the true nature of man, as laid out 1400 years ago, and such an outcome is unacceptable in Islam.
We have said that the results of the practices of sharia societies regarding science and innovation have been tragic from an economic standpoint; the results of similar thinking on matters of mental health seem even more profoudly tragic on a human level.
UPDATE
We recommend Shrinkwrapped’s Sex and Islam.

April 4th, 2006 at 12:12 pm
“unconscious motivation deprives man of choice” is actually a pretty accurate statement of how Freudians see the unanalysed or pre-analysis patient. “Free choice” is an illusion, if one accepts Freud’s outlook, since we perform like trained seals to commands buried in our unconscious. Inly through years and years of expensive analysis, available only from approved psychoanalysts, can we have enough insight to understand and control those commands.
Unless of course what we see as insight and control are just obedience to deeper and deeper unconscious commands… more analysis!
(I believe that Freudianism is as much personal pathology writ large as Leninism is.)
AND, why shouldn’t the west’s foul ideas be turned to the prophet’s will? The faithful use reconstructive surgery to replace damaged hymens…
April 4th, 2006 at 3:30 pm
Dear Jack,
I’ve emailed 3 of the finest “right winged” psych bloggers and asked that they would send you cites/links to their work and the works of other in the field.
Hate to be “paranoid” …..But Google has shown in
many instances that they are not playing fair.
May be just like Borders and all the LSM and just
burying information that would “offend” CAIR.
I know that at least 5 of these blogs have addressed this issue more than once. So hope they will inundate your email box with their answers.
April 4th, 2006 at 9:19 pm
Submitted for Your Approval
First off… any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here, and here. Die spambots, die! And now… here are all the links submitted by members of the Watcher’s Council for this week’s vote. Council li…
April 5th, 2006 at 5:53 am
Fascinating essay. Thanks for writing it. I was reminded that under Stalin, the vibrant psychoanalytic community of the ’20′s in the Soviet Union was wiped out, its members executed and/or sent to the Gulag to die. The psychoanalytic method was incompatible with Marxist economic determinism and was condemned as a dangerous bourgeois anachronism. In the post-Stalin days, deviation from the party line was ‘diagnosed’ often as mental illness, requiring hospitalization, medication and shock treatment. Totalitarian Islam will, most likely, follow the same path. They’ve already taken to diagnosing apostates as mentally ill. Staghound is completely wrong in his comments about psychoanalysis, which does not view us as mere puppets driven about by our unconscious. Freud’s earliest theorizing, positing a location for “the unconscious” gave way in the face of observed clinical data to his structural theory: the id, ego and superego. Consciousness or unconsciousness are qualities that can attach to each and in varying degree. The ego is especially the seat of rationality, judgment, assessment of reality. We strive in psychoanalysis to expand rationality, through self-inquiry, and thereby expand our power to shape our own lives, achieve true independence of thought and action and free the individual to find satisfaction in all spheres of life.
April 5th, 2006 at 8:45 pm
Every time I come over here I want to steal something and drag it back to my blog…sometimes I do. Like the patents thing. A delicious, meaty piece indeed.
Islamic psychotherapy seems an oxymoron at best. Free inquiry, free association — Allah protect us.
I always thought of Freud and Marx as the last of the Jewish prophets…
April 30th, 2006 at 3:25 pm
This article appears to be a ironic self-portrait of its authors. The authors wrote that “All science must begin with free inquiry”, a remarkable declaration for them since they dont do this principle justice.
December 1st, 2008 at 11:50 am
I think, the writter must need to know about ISLAM and PSYCHOLOGY both….before writing this article…in the whole world there is no religion like ISLAM, and if ISLAM is harsh in some cases then those were in the benifit of humanbeing….and if it is not so….then why non-muslim states develop there law and order according to ISLAM’s preaching. As far as concerned with Sigmund Freud u need to learn him as well….when you as a clinician gets a single patient for very first time your thinking about Freud will be change imidiately, he was so right what ever he said…..and ISLAM is true psychology and Psychology is a true ISLAM. If person is obeying all the teachings of ISLAM, he will never face any psychological disorders in his life…..even he will never be the reason of pscychological disturbances for other people as well…sorry you need to study more
August 27th, 2009 at 8:38 am
Poor research skills indeed. There’s something that needs to be said about background of every writer, his preconceived bias, prejudice and the ideology of the reigning culture which teaches him/her how to assess science and free investigation through “free inquiry” for the progression of truth. To treat islam and psychoanalysis in such a disjunction is to miss out on the wide depth and rigor of psycho-analysis that aims to free not only the individual from his/her repressed state, but also aims to build a culture of recognition and negotiation.
The first problem if anyone has read history (and that doesn’t count only western and american history), then it is easy to see the ahistorical treatment islam gets from this article. I thought it would have some balance and factual treatment of islam. To freely consume the mainstream biases against islam is a fallacy, and to treat muslim/s as a monolithic group without considering the diverse practice/tradition/background and the workings of modernity into such practices is just purely ignorant. There is no justification for example in the article that Islam teaches its members not to doubt.
If you really want to assess islam and psychoanalysis, first of all you perhaps, if I am not mistaken treat your Descartian certainty and delve into self doubt. Then find out about islam through scholarly articles, its philosophy, history: Look into sufism and early philosophers who had extensively translated and commented on the greeks. Look also into current scholars who are working in the field rather than consume the mainstream view of things (after all that’s what freud and lacan were trying to demystify) rather than treat a group as monolithic in its ideas as much as practices.
February 27th, 2010 at 5:28 pm
“Then find out about islam through scholarly articles,”
I don’t think the scholarly aspect of Islam is why we are all reading about Islam. I came here looking for a psychoanalysis of the individual sociopathic acts of Muslims. Wondering if below the surface they are ripe with rape. pedophilia, violence, the threat and intimidation of one another.
Wanted to get a little insight into their pecking order.
I suspect the perfect Imam is a sociopath with a a hell good memory for the Quran.
What breeds sociopaths?