<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The President should never have lied to conservatives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2006/05/21/the-president-should-never-have-lied-to-conservatives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2006/05/21/the-president-should-never-have-lied-to-conservatives/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: rainwolf</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2006/05/21/the-president-should-never-have-lied-to-conservatives/#comment-157016</link>
		<dc:creator>rainwolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 21:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2006/05/21/the-president-should-never-have-lied-to-conservatives/#comment-157016</guid>
		<description>owl writes:

"The crack came with Miers. You all just knew what was best for all."

Best is, not a nomination for another potential disaster like the Daddy Bush mishap with David Souter, one who previously voted as a part-time conservativeand is now one of the court's more liberal members.  GWB promised a SCOTUS nominee that was a proven conservative, not a total unknown.  

"When I see the disloyalty shown to President Bush from this Party, I would love to give it back."

GWB's refusal to stand with his party's majority and the majority of the American people on the immigration issue doesn't count as disloyalty to you? There is a substantial difference between loyalty and refusing to be blindly led to slaughter.   Immigration in all it's forms are setting this country up for a great fall.  Open your eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>owl writes:</p>
<p>&#8220;The crack came with Miers. You all just knew what was best for all.&#8221;</p>
<p>Best is, not a nomination for another potential disaster like the Daddy Bush mishap with David Souter, one who previously voted as a part-time conservativeand is now one of the court&#8217;s more liberal members.  GWB promised a SCOTUS nominee that was a proven conservative, not a total unknown.  </p>
<p>&#8220;When I see the disloyalty shown to President Bush from this Party, I would love to give it back.&#8221;</p>
<p>GWB&#8217;s refusal to stand with his party&#8217;s majority and the majority of the American people on the immigration issue doesn&#8217;t count as disloyalty to you? There is a substantial difference between loyalty and refusing to be blindly led to slaughter.   Immigration in all it&#8217;s forms are setting this country up for a great fall.  Open your eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: owl</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2006/05/21/the-president-should-never-have-lied-to-conservatives/#comment-155767</link>
		<dc:creator>owl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 23:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2006/05/21/the-president-should-never-have-lied-to-conservatives/#comment-155767</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;This immigration issue is of great consequence, and demands honest debate above all other considerations&lt;/i&gt;.  

So why do you start it with something that makes my blood boil?  &lt;i&gt;Trust was the coin of the realm for Bush with the conservative base. They were willing to put up with a lot because they had faith in him as a person, often attributing his mistakes to bad advice or grand strategy or knowledge (particularly on war matters) that was confidential&lt;/i&gt;.

Yes trust.  I do not trust people that have very little loyalty.  

&lt;i&gt;They were willing to put up with a lot...&lt;/i&gt;  

That darn near says it all.  Just exactly what you listed as having to put up with was bogus.  Miers was not your decision to make.....it was a hissy fit by a segment that demanded.  Did not make a damn what others in the Party wanted.    It came because they found a weak link in the chain when he showed he didn't walk on water or stop hurricanes.  Instead of fighting Blanco/Landieu, we had to have a hairshirt Fry Brownie Moment.   Dubai Ports?  Hysterical hissy fits that did not even make sense.  

We needed to make some illegal immigration changes.  We needed to stop the flow and find a way to document.  The same element that has decided to out-moon the moonbats with BDS have made this entire discussion impossible.  

Are any of you listening to yourselves?  

I use to have great respect for this site and several others.  I refuse to switch from having to accept what we refer to as MSM from Democrats to our own little elite MSM that dictates to all of us what we think.  The crack came with Miers.  You all just &lt;b&gt;knew&lt;/b&gt; what was best for all.  When I see the disloyalty shown to President Bush from this Party, I would love to give it back.  Unfortunately, some of you are putting me in the same situation as I imagine Senator Joe finds himself.  Being lead along by a bunch that has zero tolerance for others.  After all, they &lt;b&gt;know&lt;/b&gt; that they have been lied to exactly like Michael Moore could have told them back when.  At least he was more honest with it.  It is pure BDS and you can find a moonbat anywhere in the world with a sign hung round their neck. 

.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>This immigration issue is of great consequence, and demands honest debate above all other considerations</i>.  </p>
<p>So why do you start it with something that makes my blood boil?  <i>Trust was the coin of the realm for Bush with the conservative base. They were willing to put up with a lot because they had faith in him as a person, often attributing his mistakes to bad advice or grand strategy or knowledge (particularly on war matters) that was confidential</i>.</p>
<p>Yes trust.  I do not trust people that have very little loyalty.  </p>
<p><i>They were willing to put up with a lot&#8230;</i>  </p>
<p>That darn near says it all.  Just exactly what you listed as having to put up with was bogus.  Miers was not your decision to make&#8230;..it was a hissy fit by a segment that demanded.  Did not make a damn what others in the Party wanted.    It came because they found a weak link in the chain when he showed he didn&#8217;t walk on water or stop hurricanes.  Instead of fighting Blanco/Landieu, we had to have a hairshirt Fry Brownie Moment.   Dubai Ports?  Hysterical hissy fits that did not even make sense.  </p>
<p>We needed to make some illegal immigration changes.  We needed to stop the flow and find a way to document.  The same element that has decided to out-moon the moonbats with BDS have made this entire discussion impossible.  </p>
<p>Are any of you listening to yourselves?  </p>
<p>I use to have great respect for this site and several others.  I refuse to switch from having to accept what we refer to as MSM from Democrats to our own little elite MSM that dictates to all of us what we think.  The crack came with Miers.  You all just <b>knew</b> what was best for all.  When I see the disloyalty shown to President Bush from this Party, I would love to give it back.  Unfortunately, some of you are putting me in the same situation as I imagine Senator Joe finds himself.  Being lead along by a bunch that has zero tolerance for others.  After all, they <b>know</b> that they have been lied to exactly like Michael Moore could have told them back when.  At least he was more honest with it.  It is pure BDS and you can find a moonbat anywhere in the world with a sign hung round their neck. </p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
