Comments on: The EADS Airbus A380 delays http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2006/06/18/the-eads-airbus-a380-delays/ Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:49:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: Burnelli Support Group http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2006/06/18/the-eads-airbus-a380-delays/#comment-302025 Burnelli Support Group Wed, 17 Oct 2007 03:06:46 +0000 http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2006/06/18/the-eads-airbus-a380-delays/#comment-302025 This is just a larger version of the flimsy, explosive design we’ve been forced to fly in for over 50 years. Accidents happen and the A380 has no exemptions from them. Denial that it will happen is just wishful thinking and when one of these does go down you can kiss a whole small town goodbye. Just a tragedy waiting to happen. Thank God it’s been delayed for so long and orders have dropped off significantly. If you have to fly one of these cracker box jumbos, fly the 747. Titanic? Most assuredly, but only half the number of people will die in it’s crashing as did in the Titanic’s sinking. They hopefully won’t suffer as long though. Wouldn’t it be great to fly in a plane that would take off and land at just over 100 mph, carry at least 2 times the load of a commercial airliner (like the 747) with the same fuel economy, land at even the moderate sized airports, walk away from a crash instead of explode into flames from a runway overrun? This plane would also cost 1/2 the price or less to manufacture and would need only 1/2 the runway length. The A380 ain’t it. I’ve already seen some pretty violent tail strikes and scary take-offs by this plane. They’re all on U-Tube. Take a look. Visit www.aircrash.org and find out about Vincent Burnelli’s airfoil, lifting fuselage and give them your support for a safer, more economical, eco-friendly aircraft. Just Google “Burnelli” images for so of his early planes and see what I’m talking about. Google the 1964 "GB-888A" jet airliner design. It is unbelievably modern and could have carried 600 safely back then. Its predecessor, the UB-14 crashed violently in 1935 with 7 aboard. All was caught on film. There was no fire and all 7 walked away, unhurt. Their survival was not by chance but by design. The comments about this plane are not my opinion, they are facts from past flight and wind tunnel testing and from the documented, proven history of safety and performance. Some of us who have found this better, safer, more intelligent and most of all “proven” design are working for it’s revival and construction for commercial use. Join in. Every person can make a difference if they believe they can. Reduce the risk of flying, reduce the stress of flying and reduce the huge carbon footprint made by all existing airliners including the A380. The Burnelli design would save lives, save money, save land and cut air travel greenhouse gases by 40 to 50 percent. What's not to love about this design? Go to the aircrash site now and see what you can do to help in the effort to bring the dream back to life. This is just a larger version of the flimsy, explosive design we’ve been forced to fly in for over 50 years. Accidents happen and the A380 has no exemptions from them. Denial that it will happen is just wishful thinking and when one of these does go down you can kiss a whole small town goodbye. Just a tragedy waiting to happen. Thank God it’s been delayed for so long and orders have dropped off significantly. If you have to fly one of these cracker box jumbos, fly the 747.

Titanic? Most assuredly, but only half the number of people will die in it’s crashing as did in the Titanic’s sinking. They hopefully won’t suffer as long though.

Wouldn’t it be great to fly in a plane that would take off and land at just over 100 mph, carry at least 2 times the load of a commercial airliner (like the 747) with the same fuel economy, land at even the moderate sized airports, walk away from a crash instead of explode into flames from a runway overrun? This plane would also cost 1/2 the price or less to manufacture and would need only 1/2 the runway length.

The A380 ain’t it. I’ve already seen some pretty violent tail strikes and scary take-offs by this plane. They’re all on U-Tube. Take a look.

Visit http://www.aircrash.org and find out about Vincent Burnelli’s airfoil, lifting fuselage and give them your support for a safer, more economical, eco-friendly aircraft. Just Google “Burnelli” images for so of his early planes and see what I’m talking about. Google the 1964 “GB-888A” jet airliner design. It is unbelievably modern and could have carried 600 safely back then.

Its predecessor, the UB-14 crashed violently in 1935 with 7 aboard. All was caught on film. There was no fire and all 7 walked away, unhurt. Their survival was not by chance but by design. The comments about this plane are not my opinion, they are facts from past flight and wind tunnel testing and from the documented, proven history of safety and performance.

Some of us who have found this better, safer, more intelligent and most of all “proven” design are working for it’s revival and construction for commercial use. Join in. Every person can make a difference if they believe they can. Reduce the risk of flying, reduce the stress of flying and reduce the huge carbon footprint made by all existing airliners including the A380. The Burnelli design would save lives, save money, save land and cut air travel greenhouse gases by 40 to 50 percent. What’s not to love about this design? Go to the aircrash site now and see what you can do to help in the effort to bring the dream back to life.

]]>