<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Old World blather and Ahmadinejad&#8217;s non-stop diplomacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2006/06/20/old-world-blather-and-ahmadinejads-non-stop-diplomacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2006/06/20/old-world-blather-and-ahmadinejads-non-stop-diplomacy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:24:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2006/06/20/old-world-blather-and-ahmadinejads-non-stop-diplomacy/#comment-202627</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 09:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2006/06/20/old-world-blather-and-ahmadinejads-non-stop-diplomacy/#comment-202627</guid>
		<description>&#039;Both sides had bought time - but each used it differently. Hitler used his time to rebuild Germany’s war machine; Britain and France used theirs to deepen their illusions about an ever-elusive peace&#039;

...well OK, but Britain also used the time to develop and construct the Spitfire and Radar.

What&#039;s the worst case here?

I&#039;d suggest a nuclear weapon exploding in a piece of real estate that the West is fond of. 

Shortly thereafter, some retaliation goes in with an unanimous vote in Congress or the Knesset and it&#039;s all over.

The acute war should take about 5 hours, the residual combat about 5 months.

The assessment of intelligence failure should take about 5 years and the cleanup about 20 with the ordinary complaint that Halliburton is getting favorable treatment. Cable News viewing numbers will soar.

You weren&#039;t seriously suggesting that military force would be used in a pre-emptive mode were you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Both sides had bought time &#8211; but each used it differently. Hitler used his time to rebuild Germany’s war machine; Britain and France used theirs to deepen their illusions about an ever-elusive peace&#8217;</p>
<p>&#8230;well OK, but Britain also used the time to develop and construct the Spitfire and Radar.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the worst case here?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d suggest a nuclear weapon exploding in a piece of real estate that the West is fond of. </p>
<p>Shortly thereafter, some retaliation goes in with an unanimous vote in Congress or the Knesset and it&#8217;s all over.</p>
<p>The acute war should take about 5 hours, the residual combat about 5 months.</p>
<p>The assessment of intelligence failure should take about 5 years and the cleanup about 20 with the ordinary complaint that Halliburton is getting favorable treatment. Cable News viewing numbers will soar.</p>
<p>You weren&#8217;t seriously suggesting that military force would be used in a pre-emptive mode were you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
