We referred to this gentleman, Mr. Nihad Awad, below. He is very indignant that President Bush said the two words, “Islamic fascism.” He thinks such words are hurtful and unhelpful. Perhaps Mr. Nihad Awad would like to review such things as Hezbollah’s founding documents:

We are often asked: Who are we, the Hizballah, and what is our identity? We are the sons of the umma (Muslim community) — the party of God (Hizb Allah) the vanguard of which was made victorious by God in Iran. There the vanguard succeeded to lay down the bases of a Muslim state which plays a central role in the world. We obey the orders of one leader, wise and just, that of our tutor and faqih (jurist) who fulfills all the necessary conditions: [Ayatollah] Ruhollah Musawi Khomeini. God save him!

By virtue of the above, we do not constitute an organized and closed party in Lebanon. Nor are we a tight political cadre. We are an umma linked to the Muslims of the whole world by the solid doctrinal and religious connection of Islam, whose message God wanted to be fulfilled by the Seal of the Prophets, i.e., Muhammad. This is why whatever touches or strikes the Muslims in Afghanistan, Iraq, the Philippines and elsewhere reverberates throughout the whole Muslim umma of which we are an integral part.

These sentiments, and far worse, are repeated again and again and again by the Islamic fascists around the world. Has Mr. Awad failed to read Osama bin Laden’s manifesto, or the countless threats and promises of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad or his mentor?

We must elminate the International Islamist fascist movement, and its transnational theocratic goverment project, from the face of the planet, or at least from the West. The West is tolerant and practices equality. But those who would be given equality must also practice it with others. For its part, the Muslim world needs to specifically reject the belief that infidels are inferior to them and are, for example, to be assigned an inferior place by Islamic governments. The jizya needs to vanish, as do many archaic and discriminatory practices that have no place in the modern world.

There needs to be parallel tolerance between two worlds, or at least separation if that is not possible. For example, Mecca and Medina should be as open as Vatican City. Islamic countries and policies should welcome churches and synagogues, or why should Western countries welcome mosques? Those who whine and demand tolerance must demonstrate their bona fides in being tolerant.

A first step for Mr. Awad would be demonstrating solidarity with the United States, or offering some proof that the rather obvious and overt worldwide Islamic fascist movement does not exist. Failing that, he should perhaps find a more suitable country in which to reside.

This entry was posted on Friday, August 11th, 2006 at 2:47 am and is filed under General, idiots!, Iran, Left of Left, Religion, War. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.