http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2006/08/28/convert-to-islam-or-die-the-nyts-strange-definition-of-unharmed/ Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:49:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2006/08/28/convert-to-islam-or-die-the-nyts-strange-definition-of-unharmed/#comment-244805 david Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:58:23 +0000 http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2006/08/28/convert-to-islam-or-die-the-nyts-strange-definition-of-unharmed/#comment-244805 As somebody smarter than I has suggested, does anybody think that the NYT would shrug it off if we offered the goblins we have down in Gitmo the choice of death or Christianity? As somebody smarter than I has suggested, does anybody think that the NYT would shrug it off if we offered the goblins we have down in Gitmo the choice of death or Christianity?

]]> http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2006/08/28/convert-to-islam-or-die-the-nyts-strange-definition-of-unharmed/#comment-244789 qwerty182764 Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:35:47 +0000 http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2006/08/28/convert-to-islam-or-die-the-nyts-strange-definition-of-unharmed/#comment-244789 This can hardly be called a "conversion". It's just a tactical maneuver to avoid being killed by fanatics. Why not babble whatever their magic words are to get away? This can hardly be called a “conversion”. It’s just a tactical maneuver to avoid being killed by fanatics. Why not babble whatever their magic words are to get away?

]]> http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2006/08/28/convert-to-islam-or-die-the-nyts-strange-definition-of-unharmed/#comment-244694 The Baltimore Reporter Tue, 29 Aug 2006 02:12:49 +0000 http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2006/08/28/convert-to-islam-or-die-the-nyts-strange-definition-of-unharmed/#comment-244694 [...] the link is here. [...] [...] the link is here. [...]

]]> http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2006/08/28/convert-to-islam-or-die-the-nyts-strange-definition-of-unharmed/#comment-244635 Paul Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:42:24 +0000 http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2006/08/28/convert-to-islam-or-die-the-nyts-strange-definition-of-unharmed/#comment-244635 The NY Times coming to the defense of free will and personal property in the fundamental form of ones body? Ha! Well, maybe for abortion, or Gitmo prisoners, but these where white males working for right wing FOX. So, fugehaboutit! The NY Times coming to the defense of free will and personal property in the fundamental form of ones body? Ha! Well, maybe for abortion, or Gitmo prisoners, but these where white males working for right wing FOX. So, fugehaboutit!

]]>