Quo vadis?
Edwards I:
“I–there’s no answer to that question at this moment. I think that it’s a–it’s a–it’s a very bad thing for Iran to get a nuclear weapon. I think we have–we have many steps in front of us that have not been used. We ought to negotiate directly with the Iranians, which has not, not been done. The things that I just talked about, I think, are the right approach in dealing with Iran. And then we’ll, we’ll see what the result is. . . . I think–I think the–we don’t know, and you have to make a judgment as you go along, and that’s what I would do as president.”
Edwards II:
“Let me be clear: Under no circumstances can Iran be allowed to have nuclear weapons. . . . To ensure that Iran never gets nuclear weapons, we need to keep all options on the table. Let me reiterate — all options must remain on the table.”
We are glad that that is cleared up once and for all.
February 9th, 2007 at 8:53 pm
That’s bad. Even worse, the stammering wishy-washy Edwards I spoke after the firm Edwards II.
February 10th, 2007 at 2:27 am
Edwards is and always will be an asshat. Here in NC only the extreme left in the state will support the silk pony. The rest of us just stand back and laugh at the absolutely worst Senator on this great states history.
February 10th, 2007 at 5:03 am
The man is a walking hairdo. But his problem reveals a Dem problem in general – how to oppose the war while defending their decisions and previous statements.
Why don’t they simply say ” I changed my mind”? Keynes to Churchill:
“When my information changes, I change my opinion. What do you do, Sir?”