<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It almost adds to 100%</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2007/09/20/it-almost-adds-to-100/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2007/09/20/it-almost-adds-to-100/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:49:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jtc</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2007/09/20/it-almost-adds-to-100/#comment-301905</link>
		<dc:creator>jtc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 21:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2007/09/20/it-almost-adds-to-100/#comment-301905</guid>
		<description>No, you didn&#039;t get the math right.  

Someone could both think that Congress is doing a good job and be proud of their country.  

Example: 100 people.  88 are proud of America.  11 are happy with congress.  10 are both.  

88+11-10=89  

89% are either proud or happy or both.  

You don;t have the poll numbers for the &#039;both&#039; category, so you can&#039;t do any meaningful arithmetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, you didn&#8217;t get the math right.  </p>
<p>Someone could both think that Congress is doing a good job and be proud of their country.  </p>
<p>Example: 100 people.  88 are proud of America.  11 are happy with congress.  10 are both.  </p>
<p>88+11-10=89  </p>
<p>89% are either proud or happy or both.  </p>
<p>You don;t have the poll numbers for the &#8216;both&#8217; category, so you can&#8217;t do any meaningful arithmetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2007/09/20/it-almost-adds-to-100/#comment-301903</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2007/09/20/it-almost-adds-to-100/#comment-301903</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure we&#039;re talking about disjoint sets.

88% - normal Americans
11% - idiots
---
   1% - remainder - unavailable because off writing comments on blogs. Probably closer in nature o the 11%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure we&#8217;re talking about disjoint sets.</p>
<p>88% &#8211; normal Americans<br />
11% &#8211; idiots<br />
&#8212;<br />
   1% &#8211; remainder &#8211; unavailable because off writing comments on blogs. Probably closer in nature o the 11%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2007/09/20/it-almost-adds-to-100/#comment-301901</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2007/09/20/it-almost-adds-to-100/#comment-301901</guid>
		<description>I like this blog. 

It&#039;s so rare that I could even venture to employ an example of Set Theory as a response to any post in the blogosphere.

The USA and the Congress of the USA are disjoint sets in the view of the poll respondents - the Universal Set.

I think that&#039;s right but it&#039;s been a while since I did any of that math.

Or in other words, the Congress is not pertinent to the standing of the USA.

I may have the math wrong but that last statement  feels right.:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this blog. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s so rare that I could even venture to employ an example of Set Theory as a response to any post in the blogosphere.</p>
<p>The USA and the Congress of the USA are disjoint sets in the view of the poll respondents &#8211; the Universal Set.</p>
<p>I think that&#8217;s right but it&#8217;s been a while since I did any of that math.</p>
<p>Or in other words, the Congress is not pertinent to the standing of the USA.</p>
<p>I may have the math wrong but that last statement  feels right.:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gs</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2007/09/20/it-almost-adds-to-100/#comment-301899</link>
		<dc:creator>gs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2007/09/20/it-almost-adds-to-100/#comment-301899</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;According to a new Zogby poll, only 11% of Americans think that Congress is doing a good or excellent job.&lt;/i&gt;

The Republicans emphatically have &lt;b&gt;not&lt;/b&gt; taken advantage of this unpopularity by returning to their limited-government roots[1].  They remain the party that responded to their loss of Congress by restoring Trent Lott to the leadership.  Apparently they&#039;d rather be the minority under the &lt;i&gt;status quo&lt;/i&gt; than take stands which, in addition to being principled, have brought them electoral success.  Such intransigence is yet another indication that the political establishment is corrupt.

[1] Fred Thompson, whom I haven&#039;t thought much about yet, seems the prominent exception.  Normally I wouldn&#039;t give serious consideration to a presidential candidate with Thompson&#039;s lack of executive experience, but I increasingly wonder if it isn&#039;t time to roll the dice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>According to a new Zogby poll, only 11% of Americans think that Congress is doing a good or excellent job.</i></p>
<p>The Republicans emphatically have <b>not</b> taken advantage of this unpopularity by returning to their limited-government roots[1].  They remain the party that responded to their loss of Congress by restoring Trent Lott to the leadership.  Apparently they&#8217;d rather be the minority under the <i>status quo</i> than take stands which, in addition to being principled, have brought them electoral success.  Such intransigence is yet another indication that the political establishment is corrupt.</p>
<p>[1] Fred Thompson, whom I haven&#8217;t thought much about yet, seems the prominent exception.  Normally I wouldn&#8217;t give serious consideration to a presidential candidate with Thompson&#8217;s lack of executive experience, but I increasingly wonder if it isn&#8217;t time to roll the dice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

