Names and dates
Over the past months, there has been a ratcheting up of rhetoric and preparations for a war against Iran. Now there are military men going on the record about war planning for Iran, a new development, with several possible motives. UK Times:
Project Checkmate, a successor to the group that planned the 1991 Gulf War’s air campaign, was quietly reestablished at the Pentagon in June. It reports directly to General Michael Moseley, the US Air Force chief, and consists of 20-30 top air force officers and defence and cyberspace experts with ready access to the White House, the CIA and other intelligence agencies.
Detailed contingency planning for a possible attack on Iran has been carried out for more than two years by Centcom (US central command), according to defence sources. Checkmate’s job is to add a dash of brilliance to Air Force thinking by countering the military’s tendency to “fight the last war” and by providing innovative strategies for warfighting and assessing future needs for air, space and cyberwarfare. It is led by Brigadier-General Lawrence “Stutz” Stutzriem, who is considered one of the brightest air force generals. He is assisted by Dr Lani Kass, a former Israeli military officer and expert on cyberwarfare…
Checkmate was formed in the 1970s to counter Soviet threats but fell into disuse in the 1980s. It was revived under Colonel John Warden…Checkmate’s role is to develop the necessary expertise so that “if somebody says Iran, it says: ‘here is what you need to think about’. Here are the objectives, here are the risks, here is what it will cost, here are the numbers of planes we will lose, here is how the war is going to end and here is what the peace will look like”.
Warden added: “The Centcoms of this world are executional – they don’t have the staff, the expertise or the responsibility to do the thinking that is needed before a country makes the decision to go to war. War planning is not just about bombs, airplanes and sailing boats.”
So war planning against Iran would appear to be more real than ever, with military officials going on the record about it. In addition, the advertising of Checkmate would appear to be intended to make the point that a campaign against Iran would be better planned than the Iraq War. Such a preemptive US domestic propaganda campaign also suggests that the administration is very serious about an Iran war.

September 23rd, 2007 at 2:15 pm
When conflict is unavoidable, you go to war with the commander-in-chief you have, not the commander-in-chief you want.
September 24th, 2007 at 5:47 am
‘…a campaign against Iran would be better planned than the Iraq War’
Small dispute with that. The Iraqi war seemed very well planned. The occupation of Iraq however…
Are you considering putting ground forces into Iran here?
If the war aim is to eliminate or severely hinder the Iranian ability to manufacture nuclear weaponry, does that require ground forces?
Would you be considering war aims beyond the aforementioned?