Troublemakers in the shadows

The House Foreign Affairs Committee has decided to get tough about the Armenian genocide that took place at the time of of World War I, almost a century ago. Why the call to condemn today’s Turkey for the sins of the Ottoman Empire at this moment? Why the sudden move to condemn a Muslim ally of the US and member of NATO? Why undertake a move that “could cripple supply lines to American forces in Iraq”? Or maybe that’s the point. WaPo:

The Turkish government warned Thursday that a congressional committee vote labeling the mass killings of Armenians during the Ottoman Empire as genocide will “endanger relations” with the United States. The House Foreign Affairs Committee vote on the Armenian deaths — one of the most sensitive issues in Turkish politics and society — came as Turkish government officials prepared to ask parliament for authority to launch a military assault across the border into northern Iraq in retribution for Kurdish rebel attacks…

U.S. officials said Thursday that rising tensions over both issues could have far-reaching ramifications for American operations in Iraq. A Turkish military attack on northern Iraq could create chaos in that country’s only relatively stable region, and a Turkish threat to limit U.S. access to its air bases and roads because of the congressional vote could cripple supply lines to American forces in Iraq. “The committee’s approval of this resolution was an irresponsible move, which at a greatly sensitive time will make relations with a friend and ally more difficult,” the Turkish government said in a statement Thursday. The Turkish Foreign Ministry said Thursday night it was summoning its ambassador in Washington back to Turkey…

Reuters reported: “The U.S. House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee approved on Wednesday a resolution branding the killings during World War One as genocide. The issue of the Armenian massacres is deeply sensitive in Turkey, where it is a crime to portray them as ‘genocide.’ The non-binding resolution now goes to the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives, where Democratic leaders say there will be a vote by mid-November.”

This timing of a vote by Congress to condemn the Muslims who border northern Iraq for the genocide of Christians a century ago (a politically incorrect gesture in today’s world?) appears to be inexplicable except as a nasty piece of mischief to make the current work of the US and its military more difficult. Today’s politicians appear particularly craven, preferring subterfuge to straight talk in the decision whether to stand by our armed forces and their difficult mission in Iraq, or to try to end that mission by open debate and aboveboard measures. So they appear to try death by a thousand cuts instead.

For the record, Democratic Congresswoman Jane Harman also disapproves of the fervently anti-war Tom Lantos’ decision to bring the resolution up again now:

after a visit in February to Turkey, where I met with Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the Armenian Orthodox patriarch and colleagues of murdered Turkish Armenian journalist Hrant Dink, I became convinced that passing this resolution again at this time would isolate and embarrass a courageous and moderate Islamic government in perhaps the most volatile region in the world. So I agree with eight former secretaries of State — including Los Angeles’ own Warren Christopher — who said that passing the resolution “could endanger our national security interests in the region, including our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan…there is the need for stability in the region. Turkey shares a border with Iraq, and the need for its continued restraint with the Kurds

The US military does not deserve the disrespect implicit in the actions of Lantos’ Committee and Congress, and frankly the remembrance of the victims of the Armenian genocide deserves better too.

6 Responses to “Troublemakers in the shadows”

  1. staghounds Says:

    Oh hell. I agree with Warren “midnight basketball for Hamas” Christopher.

  2. sherlock Says:

    Dan Schorr said this morning on NPR that the timing of this was “unfortunate”. I guess when the Democrats have a political need for defeat at the same time that great progress is being made in achieving victory, it is indeed “unfortunate” that the Congress is controlled by Democrats instead of Americans. Apparently Democrats have an inalienable right to pursue their political agenda, free from criticism from those whom it may hurt. I guess that’s what happens when one party and the media are lovers.

  3. gs Says:

    The US military does not deserve the disrespect implicit in the actions of Lantos’ Committee and Congress, and frankly the remembrance of the victims of the Armenian genocide deserves better too.

    I agree, but the counterarguments are worth articulating.

    According to Teresita at the Elephant Bar, Y2K candidate Bush wrote

    The twentieth century was marred by wars of unimaginable brutality, mass murder and genocide. History records that the Armenians were the first people of the last century to have endured these cruelties. The Armenians were subjected to a genocidal campaign that defies comprehension and commands all decent people to remember and acknowledge the facts and lessons of an awful crime in a century of bloody crimes against humanity. If elected President, I would ensure that our nation properly recognizes the tragic suffering of the Armenian people.

    Bush’s statement is here.

    Teresita adds:

    …after being strung along by Turkey right up to D-Day in the Iraq War, then having to shift to a single-front campaign at the last minute, I would have thrown the Turkish ambassador out of the country on his ass. I sure as hell wouldn’t lobby Congress to let them maintain their Big Lie.

    This begs the question of why America’s top-level war leadership continued to rely on Turkey after Turkey had just left us in the lurch.

  4. libhomo Says:

    There are no legitimate reasons for opposing the Armenian genocide resolution. Only people who are in favor of genocide are opposing it.

    The garbage about the timing of the resolution is just that, garbage. The resolution should have been passed years ago. There is no excuse whatsoever for any further delays.

  5. Muslims Against Sharia Says:

    Muslims Against Sharia commend House Democrats and Speaker Pelosi for pressing ahead with an Armenian genocide bill. Republican opposition to the bill is pure manifestation of moral relativism.
    Muslims Against Sharia condemn Turkish government for refusing to acknowledge Armenian genocide and recalling its US ambassador in response to the bill.

    Source: AFP
    Post

  6. Jeff Says:

    I just find it odd, even given the gravity of the Armenian genocide, that Congress appears more concerned with an almost 100 year old event than they are with the current genocide operating in Darfur.

    I suppose it is simply easier to avoid an issue where they might actually have the scary possibility of having to take military action?

    What’s Congress’ poll standing again?

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word