Comments on: Anything but a true “undecided voter”

By: Peter

Peter — Wed, 21 Nov 2007 02:30:35 +0000

Democrats and their stooges in the liberal media have to lie & cheat about everything.

Deception is in their DNA — it has to be.

By: gs

gs — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:13:32 +0000

Maybe the Democrats refused to debate on Fox out of suspicion that a Fox debate would get rigged against them. At the very least, Fox would have reported the hanky-panky that CNN was willing to allow.

The Democrats also had a legitimate pretext to avoid Fox:

Fox News Channel chairman Roger Ailes accepted the RTNDF’s 2007 First Amendment Leadership Award tonight…(p)He delivered a few funny “headlines,” encouraged diversity of thought in newsrooms, said “freedom depends on fairness in the press,” and concluded with thoughts on religion.

“Freedom depends on fairness in the press”: right. From the Ailes transcript:

And it is true that Barack Obama is on the move. I don’t know if it’s true that President Bush called Musharraf and said, ‘Why can’t we catch this guy?’ [Laughter]

This, after the blowback from Trent Lott’s Strom Thurmond remark (of course, Trent’s Senate buddies have restored him to the Republican leadership).

A plague on both their houses.

By: sherlock

sherlock — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:04:21 +0000

Why would CNN took the risks of having so many insiders ask the questions, when they could have used less-connected and thus safer persons to ask the same questions? Possible options:
1. They never imagined they would get caught.
2. There were no less-connected people available in that audience, or they didn’t want there to be.
3. CNN had nothing to do with it - the DNC ran the whole show.

This doesn’t let CNN off the hook - they seem to be proven to be one (or more) of:
1. totally clueless
2. totally corrupted
3. totally irrelevant