<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Nixon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2007/11/21/the-new-nixon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2007/11/21/the-new-nixon/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: gs</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2007/11/21/the-new-nixon/#comment-302146</link>
		<dc:creator>gs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2007/11/21/the-new-nixon/#comment-302146</guid>
		<description>'John Ellis' has a familiar ring.  After googling around, I consider it virtually certain that he is &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Prescott_Ellis" rel="nofollow"&gt;John Prescott Ellis&lt;/a&gt;, George Bush's cousin.  In any case, RealClear(?)Politics deserves a black mark for ambiguity.

Continuing Dinocrat's quote:&lt;blockquote&gt;...through hell and back. She is experienced in a way that only her husband and President George W. Bush are experienced.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Bill Clinton and George W. Bush is a...singular...pairing.  Why not mention the other two living ex-Presidents?  Is the Ellis piece meant as groundwork for an eventual Jeb Bush candidacy?  

If so, fuhgeddaboudit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;John Ellis&#8217; has a familiar ring.  After googling around, I consider it virtually certain that he is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Prescott_Ellis" rel="nofollow">John Prescott Ellis</a>, George Bush&#8217;s cousin.  In any case, RealClear(?)Politics deserves a black mark for ambiguity.</p>
<p>Continuing Dinocrat&#8217;s quote:<br />
<blockquote>&#8230;through hell and back. She is experienced in a way that only her husband and President George W. Bush are experienced.</p></blockquote>
<p>Bill Clinton and George W. Bush is a&#8230;singular&#8230;pairing.  Why not mention the other two living ex-Presidents?  Is the Ellis piece meant as groundwork for an eventual Jeb Bush candidacy?  </p>
<p>If so, fuhgeddaboudit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gs</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2007/11/21/the-new-nixon/#comment-302145</link>
		<dc:creator>gs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 04:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2007/11/21/the-new-nixon/#comment-302145</guid>
		<description>Like the 1968 Nixon, Hillary Clinton has a shot only because the opposing party's outgoing administration made gross political blunders.  In contrast to 1968, the outgoing Vice President will not be her opponent.

I hope Hillary doesn't become President, but I'd vote for her over Huckabee.  And, looking forward, over another Bush.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like the 1968 Nixon, Hillary Clinton has a shot only because the opposing party&#8217;s outgoing administration made gross political blunders.  In contrast to 1968, the outgoing Vice President will not be her opponent.</p>
<p>I hope Hillary doesn&#8217;t become President, but I&#8217;d vote for her over Huckabee.  And, looking forward, over another Bush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
