Comments on: Ready to lead — day one? http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/01/01/ready-to-lead-day-one/ Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:10:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Pam Oldknow http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/01/01/ready-to-lead-day-one/#comment-302347 Pam Oldknow Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:46:04 +0000 http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/01/01/ready-to-lead-day-one/#comment-302347 I'm new to antihillary sites. Can someone explain to me what it will take to get the Clintons indicted for the criminals and traitors they are? Are we U.S. Citizens that blind and that weak that we cannot put away the two people who pose the greatest threat to our country? Pam I’m new to antihillary sites. Can someone explain to me what it will take to get the Clintons indicted for the criminals and traitors they are? Are we U.S. Citizens that blind and that weak that we cannot put away the two people who pose the greatest threat to our country?

Pam

]]> By: JMB http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/01/01/ready-to-lead-day-one/#comment-302278 JMB Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:51:24 +0000 http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/01/01/ready-to-lead-day-one/#comment-302278 You are expecting substance, when all that is important is form. Did she look presidential when she made the statement? It doesn't matter whether she's right or not. How many people understand Pakistani politics any better than Hillary? Pfft. Silly you. You are expecting substance, when all that is important is form. Did she look presidential when she made the statement? It doesn’t matter whether she’s right or not. How many people understand Pakistani politics any better than Hillary? Pfft. Silly you.

]]> By: gs http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/01/01/ready-to-lead-day-one/#comment-302266 gs Tue, 01 Jan 2008 22:43:21 +0000 http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/01/01/ready-to-lead-day-one/#comment-302266 This underscores <a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/pnoonan/?id=110011048" rel="nofollow">Peggy Noonan's</a> assessment of Hillary quoted in my <a href="http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2007/12/30/notable-quotable/#comment-302261" rel="nofollow">previous comment</a>. The inattention to facts is disquieting in view of the obvious pains (IMO) that were taken to make Clinton look Presidential during her Bhutto commentary. A lot of effort went into establishing the narrative; much less went into getting the facts straight. Did Hillary not get herself briefed before going on camera, or did no one on her staff know the details? Or, worst of all, did someone--Blitzer, Stephanopoulos, or Clinton staffer--know but did not dare to correct Her Imperiousness? This incident is a worrisome indicator about how a Clinton administration would perform in office, but unfortunately it may be irrelevant to electoral outcomes. This underscores Peggy Noonan’s assessment of Hillary quoted in my previous comment.

The inattention to facts is disquieting in view of the obvious pains (IMO) that were taken to make Clinton look Presidential during her Bhutto commentary. A lot of effort went into establishing the narrative; much less went into getting the facts straight. Did Hillary not get herself briefed before going on camera, or did no one on her staff know the details? Or, worst of all, did someone–Blitzer, Stephanopoulos, or Clinton staffer–know but did not dare to correct Her Imperiousness?

This incident is a worrisome indicator about how a Clinton administration would perform in office, but unfortunately it may be irrelevant to electoral outcomes.

]]>