Answering the thought-crime police

We won’t bother to give you the context of this government inquisitor’s attempt to probe the mind of a magazine publisher to determine whether his inner being is acceptable to the state. The whole story is fairly chilling. For many years, the proper response of a publisher to the thought police would have been a three word interview (“go to hell”) but it appears that times are different now:

The performance of the grand inquisitor in the video, a “blandly unexceptional bureaucrat,” is, its way, Oscar-worthy and reminiscent of past films that cover similar ground. The government apparently thinks it is its business to enforce a regime where “tolerance means accepting and defending everyone’s values but your own.” More of the interview here and here. (Finally, Scott Johnson manages to work Alexis de Tocqueville into the discussion.)

2 Responses to “Answering the thought-crime police”

  1. feeblemind Says:

    ‘Chilling’ is the word, Dinocrat. How long before this type of performance moves to our side of the border? Meanwhile the sheep mill about nervously in the pen, but thankful that it was another that was hauled to slaughter.

  2. staghounds Says:

    Too late, it’s here already. Not for publishers yet, but for regular people and especially employers.

Leave a Reply

Switch to our mobile site