<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tightening up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/01/14/tightening-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/01/14/tightening-up/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: gs</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/01/14/tightening-up/#comment-302312</link>
		<dc:creator>gs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/01/14/tightening-up/#comment-302312</guid>
		<description>Will does not mention the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections,_1974" rel="nofollow"&gt;1974&lt;/a&gt; post-Watergate election.  He does not discuss how Republicans got into their ominous situation.  

IMO the Republican establishment has consciously decided that their &lt;a href="http://www.hattiesburgamerican.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080114/OPINION01/801140331" rel="nofollow"&gt;pickings&lt;/a&gt; are richer as a minority party under the &lt;i&gt;status quo&lt;/i&gt; than as a majority party that provides limited, competent government.

I usually disagree with the Democrats' policies and I dislike PC elitist liberals, but I &lt;a href="http://polipundit.com/index.php?p=17726" rel="nofollow"&gt;loathe&lt;/a&gt; the Republican party, which afaic has lied to and betrayed me starting with the 1988 read-my-lips campaign.

George W. concludes his piece with &lt;blockquote&gt;Republicans should try to choose the next president. They cannot avoid choosing how their party will define itself, even if by &lt;b&gt;a loss beneath a worthy banner.&lt;/b&gt; &lt;i&gt;[emphasis mine--gs]&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;In view of their record, I could care less how they define themselves.  Presumably they'll brandish the cross and wave the flag as usual.  Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel?  That is sooo 18th-century.  Today's "conservative" scoundrels take refuge in patriotism from the get-go.
**************
It feels like the two major parties are arguing about which one will deliver the slower rate of national decline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will does not mention the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections,_1974" rel="nofollow">1974</a> post-Watergate election.  He does not discuss how Republicans got into their ominous situation.  </p>
<p>IMO the Republican establishment has consciously decided that their <a href="http://www.hattiesburgamerican.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080114/OPINION01/801140331" rel="nofollow">pickings</a> are richer as a minority party under the <i>status quo</i> than as a majority party that provides limited, competent government.</p>
<p>I usually disagree with the Democrats&#8217; policies and I dislike PC elitist liberals, but I <a href="http://polipundit.com/index.php?p=17726" rel="nofollow">loathe</a> the Republican party, which afaic has lied to and betrayed me starting with the 1988 read-my-lips campaign.</p>
<p>George W. concludes his piece with<br />
<blockquote>Republicans should try to choose the next president. They cannot avoid choosing how their party will define itself, even if by <b>a loss beneath a worthy banner.</b> <i>[emphasis mine--gs]</i></p></blockquote>
<p>In view of their record, I could care less how they define themselves.  Presumably they&#8217;ll brandish the cross and wave the flag as usual.  Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel?  That is sooo 18th-century.  Today&#8217;s &#8220;conservative&#8221; scoundrels take refuge in patriotism from the get-go.<br />
**************<br />
It feels like the two major parties are arguing about which one will deliver the slower rate of national decline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
