Subtext, or not?
Jake Tapper of ABC detects a certain deprecating subtext in Bill Clinton’s comments on Senator Barack Obama’s impressive 55/27 win in South Carolina, which doubled the total of John McCain’s votes in the GOP primary the other day:
Bill Clinton today in Columbia, SC: “Jesse Jackson won South Carolina in ‘84 and ‘88. Jackson ran a good campaign. And Obama ran a good campaign here.”…I can’t understand why anyone would think the Clintons are running a race-baiting campaign to paint Obama as “the black candidate.”
Ah, wistful vista. The “fairy tale” comments by Bill Clinton a couple of weeks ago now seem like the good old days. BTW: why does the url for the ABC story call it “bubba-obama”?

January 27th, 2008 at 10:49 am
Bubba-orama? How about just Bubba-rama? Yeah, that sounds about right, as in:
“The Dems tried to run a respectable nomination process, but got caught up yet again in a Bubba-rama.”
Aaahh, yes - could I have some more popcorn, please?