<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More predictions on the economy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/04/01/more-predictions-on-the-economy-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/04/01/more-predictions-on-the-economy-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 02:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Canucklehead</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/04/01/more-predictions-on-the-economy-2/#comment-302948</link>
		<dc:creator>Canucklehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 18:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/04/01/more-predictions-on-the-economy-2/#comment-302948</guid>
		<description>... Oil prices, stimulated almost entirely by managed commodity trading funds and hedge funds are destined to drop below $50/barrel by year end...

If the banks are going to double, business will have to pick up.  There is no way in a "roaring" economy that oil will be below $50.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; Oil prices, stimulated almost entirely by managed commodity trading funds and hedge funds are destined to drop below $50/barrel by year end&#8230;</p>
<p>If the banks are going to double, business will have to pick up.  There is no way in a &#8220;roaring&#8221; economy that oil will be below $50.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Hawkins</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/04/01/more-predictions-on-the-economy-2/#comment-302926</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Hawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 20:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/04/01/more-predictions-on-the-economy-2/#comment-302926</guid>
		<description>That 1666 looks suspicious to me. I say the RealMoney piece is for April Fool's, and the WSJ piece is supposed to be serious.

Which is not to say that the WSJ piece is more likely to be accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That 1666 looks suspicious to me. I say the RealMoney piece is for April Fool&#8217;s, and the WSJ piece is supposed to be serious.</p>
<p>Which is not to say that the WSJ piece is more likely to be accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
