<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How protracted the risk aversion?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/04/26/how-protracted-the-risk-aversion-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/04/26/how-protracted-the-risk-aversion-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 02:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: gs</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/04/26/how-protracted-the-risk-aversion-2/#comment-305014</link>
		<dc:creator>gs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/04/26/how-protracted-the-risk-aversion-2/#comment-305014</guid>
		<description>Did Bernstein foresee the current mess, or is he speaking in hindsight?  The 1993 &lt;i&gt;Capital Ideas&lt;/i&gt; is the only book of his that I've read (some time ago).  Iirc he strongly praised the new financial economics.  The WSJ interview sounds a very different note.  Since clearly the models described in &lt;i&gt;CI&lt;/i&gt; have been used far beyond the most generous estimate of their domain of validity--have been invoked as pretexts for reckless and predatory behavior--, I wish the interviewer had pressed Bernstein about how well &lt;i&gt;CI&lt;/i&gt; and the &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Capital-Ideas-Evolving-Peter-Bernstein/dp/0471731730/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&#38;s=books&#38;qid=1209420763&#38;sr=8-1" rel="nofollow"&gt;sequel are standing the test of time.  

&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://econclubny.org/files/Transcript_Volcker_April_2008.pdf#PDF" rel="nofollow"&gt;Paul Volcker&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/21352" rel="nofollow"&gt;George Soros&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idUSN2847461420080428" rel="nofollow"&gt;Warren Buffett&lt;/a&gt; don't seem too chipper either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did Bernstein foresee the current mess, or is he speaking in hindsight?  The 1993 <i>Capital Ideas</i> is the only book of his that I&#8217;ve read (some time ago).  Iirc he strongly praised the new financial economics.  The WSJ interview sounds a very different note.  Since clearly the models described in <i>CI</i> have been used far beyond the most generous estimate of their domain of validity&#8211;have been invoked as pretexts for reckless and predatory behavior&#8211;, I wish the interviewer had pressed Bernstein about how well <i>CI</i> and the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Capital-Ideas-Evolving-Peter-Bernstein/dp/0471731730/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1209420763&amp;sr=8-1" rel="nofollow">sequel are standing the test of time.  </p>
<p></a><a href="http://econclubny.org/files/Transcript_Volcker_April_2008.pdf#PDF" rel="nofollow">Paul Volcker</a>, <a href="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/21352" rel="nofollow">George Soros</a>, and <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idUSN2847461420080428" rel="nofollow">Warren Buffett</a> don&#8217;t seem too chipper either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: staghounds</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/04/26/how-protracted-the-risk-aversion-2/#comment-304993</link>
		<dc:creator>staghounds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/04/26/how-protracted-the-risk-aversion-2/#comment-304993</guid>
		<description>Mr. Bernstein is a very intelligent man, and he's very wrong. The free money is still flowing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Bernstein is a very intelligent man, and he&#8217;s very wrong. The free money is still flowing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
