<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NYT&#8217;s circulation declines again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/04/28/nyts-circulation-declines-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/04/28/nyts-circulation-declines-again/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 04:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: MarkD</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/04/28/nyts-circulation-declines-again/#comment-305224</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/04/28/nyts-circulation-declines-again/#comment-305224</guid>
		<description>The building is worth something, the paper not so.  Advertising revenue is drying up, partially because the Times is becoming less of a local paper, and partially because of competition from the web.  This trend has a long way to go.

Times Select put a lot of the more popular Times columnists out of the public view for years.

I can find "the rest of the story" on the web, for free.  It's tough to compete with free.  Now if the Times printed all the facts and left the opinions where they belong, it might be worth a few bucks a year.  Now, it's not worth much, at least to me.  In fact, it's worth precisely what I pay, which is nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The building is worth something, the paper not so.  Advertising revenue is drying up, partially because the Times is becoming less of a local paper, and partially because of competition from the web.  This trend has a long way to go.</p>
<p>Times Select put a lot of the more popular Times columnists out of the public view for years.</p>
<p>I can find &#8220;the rest of the story&#8221; on the web, for free.  It&#8217;s tough to compete with free.  Now if the Times printed all the facts and left the opinions where they belong, it might be worth a few bucks a year.  Now, it&#8217;s not worth much, at least to me.  In fact, it&#8217;s worth precisely what I pay, which is nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cammy</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/04/28/nyts-circulation-declines-again/#comment-305051</link>
		<dc:creator>cammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 01:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/04/28/nyts-circulation-declines-again/#comment-305051</guid>
		<description>its worth 25 a share buy buy buy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its worth 25 a share buy buy buy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
