<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A provocative point</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/05/13/a-provocative-point/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/05/13/a-provocative-point/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: gs</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/05/13/a-provocative-point/#comment-310301</link>
		<dc:creator>gs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 03:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/?p=6413#comment-310301</guid>
		<description>Luttwak's next-to-last sentence:&lt;blockquote&gt;That an Obama presidency would cause such complications in our dealings with the Islamic world is not likely to be a major factor with American voters, and the implication is not that it should be.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Is he being artful here?  He could have ended the sentence with "...American voters, and it should not be."  He also neglects to mention Hamas's apparent &lt;a href="http://cameron.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/04/16/a-hamas-problem-for-obama/" rel="nofollow"&gt;endorsement&lt;/a&gt; of Obama.

But Luttwak has a legitimate point: consider the assassinations of &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anwar_Sadat" rel="nofollow"&gt;Sadat&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yitzhak_Rabin" rel="nofollow"&gt;Rabin&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luttwak&#8217;s next-to-last sentence:<br />
<blockquote>That an Obama presidency would cause such complications in our dealings with the Islamic world is not likely to be a major factor with American voters, and the implication is not that it should be.</p></blockquote>
<p>Is he being artful here?  He could have ended the sentence with &#8220;&#8230;American voters, and it should not be.&#8221;  He also neglects to mention Hamas&#8217;s apparent <a href="http://cameron.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/04/16/a-hamas-problem-for-obama/" rel="nofollow">endorsement</a> of Obama.</p>
<p>But Luttwak has a legitimate point: consider the assassinations of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anwar_Sadat" rel="nofollow">Sadat</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yitzhak_Rabin" rel="nofollow">Rabin</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Logan</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/05/13/a-provocative-point/#comment-310283</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Logan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 02:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/?p=6413#comment-310283</guid>
		<description>Now you've done it -- you've given me a reason to vote for Obama! Dammit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now you&#8217;ve done it &#8212; you&#8217;ve given me a reason to vote for Obama! Dammit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
