Down the memory hole

The AP reports on the continuing slow motion mother of all flip flops by Senator Obama’s campaign, as his website changes the candidate’s formerly unambiguous position on Iraq during the primary season:

Obama’s campaign removed a reference to the surge as part of “The Problem” section on the part of his Web site devoted to laying out his plan for Iraq…The changes stress that Obama’s plan to end the war is responsible and designed to improve national security. They include:

• An updated Obama quote at the top of the page. The previous quote stressed how Obama had the judgment to oppose the “rash war” from the start. This was a popular message among Democratic voters and was meant to draw distinctions with primary rival Hillary Rodham Clinton, who initially supported the war. The new quote focuses on how ending the war will make Americans safer — a message aimed at general election voters who are more likely to trust McCain on issues of national security, according to polling.

• A description of Obama’s plan as “a responsible, phased withdrawal” that will be directed by military commanders and done in consultation with the Iraqis. Previously, the site had a sentence that has since been removed that flatly said, “Obama will immediately begin to remove our troops from Iraq.” Morigi said that his plan hasn’t changed, but they wanted to expand the description. “There’s not an intent to shift language,” she said.

• A new sentence that says Obama “would reserve the right to intervene militarily, with our international partners, to suppress potential genocidal violence within Iraq.”

Only one of his plan’s subheads remains unchanged, the first one — “Judgment You Can Trust.”

“Judgment you can trust” — but which judgment, that’s the question. Obama said, regarding the surge, in 2007: “I am not persuaded that 20,000 additional troops in Iraq is going to solve the sectarian violence there. In fact, I think it will do the reverse.” He was wrong then; is he right now?

2 Responses to “Down the memory hole”

  1. MarkD Says:

    When you are on every side of every issue, you are always right at some point.

  2. Keith Says:

    Spengler at Asian Times called this back in Febuary, I believe; what we have here is a political sociopath. He has all the characteristics of a “Stalking Horse”, i. e., a front for others. We can all guess who those are, can’t we?

Leave a Reply