<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not liking it at all</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/08/31/not-liking-it-at-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/08/31/not-liking-it-at-all/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: staghounds</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/08/31/not-liking-it-at-all/#comment-313739</link>
		<dc:creator>staghounds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/?p=6733#comment-313739</guid>
		<description>Poor Miss Dowd. So bitter, and she doesn't even have a gun to cling to. 

And she certainly should lay down being angry at the pretty- she has nothing to be ashamed of there. It's a bit pathological.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor Miss Dowd. So bitter, and she doesn&#8217;t even have a gun to cling to. </p>
<p>And she certainly should lay down being angry at the pretty- she has nothing to be ashamed of there. It&#8217;s a bit pathological.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bagoh20</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/08/31/not-liking-it-at-all/#comment-313735</link>
		<dc:creator>bagoh20</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/?p=6733#comment-313735</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, McCain can do little to control the narrative when up against both the Democrats and the media.  Is that really two different things?  (lets just call them collectively "the left")  Although considering how the left is conducting itself concerning Palin, maybe he should just let them narrate away.  Kinda like letting a crazed defendant testify, refusing his 5th amendment rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, McCain can do little to control the narrative when up against both the Democrats and the media.  Is that really two different things?  (lets just call them collectively &#8220;the left&#8221;)  Although considering how the left is conducting itself concerning Palin, maybe he should just let them narrate away.  Kinda like letting a crazed defendant testify, refusing his 5th amendment rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gs</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/08/31/not-liking-it-at-all/#comment-313699</link>
		<dc:creator>gs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 04:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/?p=6733#comment-313699</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Question: is the scriptwriter and director of this film Karl Rove?&lt;/i&gt;

There's plenty to dislike about Karl Rove's films, but the plots are focused and tightly scripted.  This doesn't seem like his handiwork:

The good news is that Obama has been forgotten for the time being and Palin/McCain are getting all the publicity.

The bad news is that the publicity is about Palin's 17-year-old daughter's &lt;a href="http://www.adn.com/palin/story/512560.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;pregnancy&lt;/a&gt;--and about Palin &lt;a href="http://www.adn.com/palin/story/512842.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;lawyering up&lt;/a&gt; for Troopergate and being threatened with a subpoena (some documentation is &lt;a href="http://media.adn.com/smedia/2008/09/01/13/van-flein-letter-082908.source.prod_affiliate.7.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://media.adn.com/smedia/2008/09/01/13/van-flein-final-response.source.prod_affiliate.7.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;).

I want to believe that McCain is ready for this.  It's important that he promptly demonstrate control of the narrative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Question: is the scriptwriter and director of this film Karl Rove?</i></p>
<p>There&#8217;s plenty to dislike about Karl Rove&#8217;s films, but the plots are focused and tightly scripted.  This doesn&#8217;t seem like his handiwork:</p>
<p>The good news is that Obama has been forgotten for the time being and Palin/McCain are getting all the publicity.</p>
<p>The bad news is that the publicity is about Palin&#8217;s 17-year-old daughter&#8217;s <a href="http://www.adn.com/palin/story/512560.html" rel="nofollow">pregnancy</a>&#8211;and about Palin <a href="http://www.adn.com/palin/story/512842.html" rel="nofollow">lawyering up</a> for Troopergate and being threatened with a subpoena (some documentation is <a href="http://media.adn.com/smedia/2008/09/01/13/van-flein-letter-082908.source.prod_affiliate.7.pdf" rel="nofollow">here</a> and <a href="http://media.adn.com/smedia/2008/09/01/13/van-flein-final-response.source.prod_affiliate.7.pdf" rel="nofollow">here</a>).</p>
<p>I want to believe that McCain is ready for this.  It&#8217;s important that he promptly demonstrate control of the narrative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/08/31/not-liking-it-at-all/#comment-313650</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/?p=6733#comment-313650</guid>
		<description>Reading the Dowd piece, I think it should start with the preface-- Dear Dairy. What a nut job, she sounds like a 13 year old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading the Dowd piece, I think it should start with the preface&#8211; Dear Dairy. What a nut job, she sounds like a 13 year old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkD</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/08/31/not-liking-it-at-all/#comment-313649</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 12:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/?p=6733#comment-313649</guid>
		<description>I miss Times Select.  It was a better world when Dowd was limited to the audience she deserves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I miss Times Select.  It was a better world when Dowd was limited to the audience she deserves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bagoh20</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/08/31/not-liking-it-at-all/#comment-313648</link>
		<dc:creator>bagoh20</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 02:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/?p=6733#comment-313648</guid>
		<description>Palin has more executive experience than the other three candidates combined.  OK, so nobody has much experience running big things.  But her experience has been successful and popular. The Dems' ticket has zip in this regard.  What is left is a clear choice between what philosophy and what kind of personal character we want to run this country.  It's not about Bush or the Clintons or what some partisans in the chattering classes create in the form of cleaver graffiti on the walls of this shinning city on the hill.  I glad the average American is more serious and fair minded than those who claim to inform as they attempt to merely influence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Palin has more executive experience than the other three candidates combined.  OK, so nobody has much experience running big things.  But her experience has been successful and popular. The Dems&#8217; ticket has zip in this regard.  What is left is a clear choice between what philosophy and what kind of personal character we want to run this country.  It&#8217;s not about Bush or the Clintons or what some partisans in the chattering classes create in the form of cleaver graffiti on the walls of this shinning city on the hill.  I glad the average American is more serious and fair minded than those who claim to inform as they attempt to merely influence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gs</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/08/31/not-liking-it-at-all/#comment-313647</link>
		<dc:creator>gs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 02:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/?p=6733#comment-313647</guid>
		<description>I like the Palin pick but acknowledge that it's risky.  Things might come out that will change the electorate's mind, or mine.  Still, who'd have thought that John McCain might be the one to resuscitate the Reagan coalition?

The Dowd piece is deranged, as is much of the little MSM scribbling about Palin that I've bothered to glance at.  So far I've only sampled the 275+ comments &lt;a href="http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=1528#comments" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;;  the Palin skepticism therein is left-of-center but &lt;i&gt;sane&lt;/i&gt;.
*****************
Keith writes, &lt;i&gt;And, most importantly, “Sarah” is the way for “John” to revise and extend his pristine views of ANWR.&lt;/i&gt;

McCain's acceptance speech would be a great vehicle for that--if it's done right.  The speech should emphasize the domestic &#38; national-security importance of energy and issue a 'whatever-it-takes' call to action.  An ANWR change of mind (flip-flop if you will) should not be phrased so as to leave McCain open to the accusation that he is a dotard manipulated by the gold-digging Palin.  The MSM would say that anyway, but McCain shouldn't give them free ammunition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the Palin pick but acknowledge that it&#8217;s risky.  Things might come out that will change the electorate&#8217;s mind, or mine.  Still, who&#8217;d have thought that John McCain might be the one to resuscitate the Reagan coalition?</p>
<p>The Dowd piece is deranged, as is much of the little MSM scribbling about Palin that I&#8217;ve bothered to glance at.  So far I&#8217;ve only sampled the 275+ comments <a href="http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=1528#comments" rel="nofollow">here</a>;  the Palin skepticism therein is left-of-center but <i>sane</i>.<br />
*****************<br />
Keith writes, <i>And, most importantly, “Sarah” is the way for “John” to revise and extend his pristine views of ANWR.</i></p>
<p>McCain&#8217;s acceptance speech would be a great vehicle for that&#8211;if it&#8217;s done right.  The speech should emphasize the domestic &amp; national-security importance of energy and issue a &#8216;whatever-it-takes&#8217; call to action.  An ANWR change of mind (flip-flop if you will) should not be phrased so as to leave McCain open to the accusation that he is a dotard manipulated by the gold-digging Palin.  The MSM would say that anyway, but McCain shouldn&#8217;t give them free ammunition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moremeaning</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/08/31/not-liking-it-at-all/#comment-313627</link>
		<dc:creator>moremeaning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 21:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/?p=6733#comment-313627</guid>
		<description>We all had the same advance notice as Rush did when McCain said "She" and went through her bio. Also, several hours before the official announcement, AP and others had mentioned that Sarah Palin and her family were seen boarding a private jet. 

So when Rush says "Everybody knows who it is.  Bring her out there!" it does not imply any special advance notice. 

The McCain campaign probably did time her appearance to coincide with Rush's commercial breaks especially since he speaks to so many of the disaffected base. This seems to be a real possibility, which Rush himself pointed out on his website "A flawless event, which even hit the EIB breaks." His transcript shows the following comments:
"We'll take our commercial break here, so as not to screw up our affiliates.  This applause is going to go on for a while.  We'll come back after the break and JIP her remarks and listen when we get back."..and toward the end:"Sarah, we got a commercial break."

I don't see this as implying that Rush was "in" on the pick just that he and his audience were wisely taken into account for the announcement to have its greatest possible impact.

Rush's "over-the-top enthusiasm" seemed genuine enough to me. Especially since the McCain campaign had sent out false indications of a prochoice VP pick such as Lieberman, Ridge &#38; others. I had thought that this might be in preparation for announcing Romney as VP - to lessen the evangelical opposition to his Mormon background by getting them to consider "Well, at least he isn't prochoice."

Anyway, the McCain campaign showed their ability to toy with everyone's mind and that they could keep a secret long enough to maximize the impact of the announcement of his VP pick. Perhaps Karl Rove was consulted. But I don't think see any especially compelling evidence that Rush was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all had the same advance notice as Rush did when McCain said &#8220;She&#8221; and went through her bio. Also, several hours before the official announcement, AP and others had mentioned that Sarah Palin and her family were seen boarding a private jet. </p>
<p>So when Rush says &#8220;Everybody knows who it is.  Bring her out there!&#8221; it does not imply any special advance notice. </p>
<p>The McCain campaign probably did time her appearance to coincide with Rush&#8217;s commercial breaks especially since he speaks to so many of the disaffected base. This seems to be a real possibility, which Rush himself pointed out on his website &#8220;A flawless event, which even hit the EIB breaks.&#8221; His transcript shows the following comments:<br />
&#8220;We&#8217;ll take our commercial break here, so as not to screw up our affiliates.  This applause is going to go on for a while.  We&#8217;ll come back after the break and JIP her remarks and listen when we get back.&#8221;..and toward the end:&#8221;Sarah, we got a commercial break.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see this as implying that Rush was &#8220;in&#8221; on the pick just that he and his audience were wisely taken into account for the announcement to have its greatest possible impact.</p>
<p>Rush&#8217;s &#8220;over-the-top enthusiasm&#8221; seemed genuine enough to me. Especially since the McCain campaign had sent out false indications of a prochoice VP pick such as Lieberman, Ridge &amp; others. I had thought that this might be in preparation for announcing Romney as VP - to lessen the evangelical opposition to his Mormon background by getting them to consider &#8220;Well, at least he isn&#8217;t prochoice.&#8221;</p>
<p>Anyway, the McCain campaign showed their ability to toy with everyone&#8217;s mind and that they could keep a secret long enough to maximize the impact of the announcement of his VP pick. Perhaps Karl Rove was consulted. But I don&#8217;t think see any especially compelling evidence that Rush was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/08/31/not-liking-it-at-all/#comment-313616</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/?p=6733#comment-313616</guid>
		<description>And, most importantly, "Sarah" is the way for "John" to revise and extend his pristine views of ANWR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, most importantly, &#8220;Sarah&#8221; is the way for &#8220;John&#8221; to revise and extend his pristine views of ANWR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
