<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Russia&#8217;s new foreign policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/09/02/russias-new-foreign-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/09/02/russias-new-foreign-policy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: feeblemind</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/09/02/russias-new-foreign-policy/#comment-313729</link>
		<dc:creator>feeblemind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/?p=6736#comment-313729</guid>
		<description>From my point of view, Medvedev is contradicting himself with point 1 and point 5. Russia will obey international law has long as it doesn't stand in the way of 'priveleged interests'. Is that the way others read it or am I way off base?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From my point of view, Medvedev is contradicting himself with point 1 and point 5. Russia will obey international law has long as it doesn&#8217;t stand in the way of &#8216;priveleged interests&#8217;. Is that the way others read it or am I way off base?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Den Beste</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/09/02/russias-new-foreign-policy/#comment-313709</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Den Beste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 01:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/?p=6736#comment-313709</guid>
		<description>Point 4 sounds suspiciously like the justification Nazi Germany used to annex the Sudetenland and to invade Poland. And I think it was the nominal justification for the invasion of France: to take back Alsace-Lorraine, wasn't it?

Anyway, what with the Soviet policy of dispersing Russians into all the conquered territories of the USSR, point 4 would justify invasion of all the former Soviet states, not just Ukraine. In particular, Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia.

And there's the whole question of Kaliningrad, which is geographically isolated from the rest of Russia. How soon before they start demanding a land connection?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Point 4 sounds suspiciously like the justification Nazi Germany used to annex the Sudetenland and to invade Poland. And I think it was the nominal justification for the invasion of France: to take back Alsace-Lorraine, wasn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>Anyway, what with the Soviet policy of dispersing Russians into all the conquered territories of the USSR, point 4 would justify invasion of all the former Soviet states, not just Ukraine. In particular, Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia.</p>
<p>And there&#8217;s the whole question of Kaliningrad, which is geographically isolated from the rest of Russia. How soon before they start demanding a land connection?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
