Comments on: So much projection http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/09/03/so-much-projection/ Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:21:34 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: staghounds http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/09/03/so-much-projection/#comment-313738 staghounds Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:48:40 +0000 http://www.dinocrat.com/?p=6738#comment-313738 Alaska is still the frontier. She will do just fine against High IQ Joe. And the odds at the actual bookmakers were like 40-1 before the announcement. Sheesh. Alaska is still the frontier. She will do just fine against High IQ Joe.

And the odds at the actual bookmakers were like 40-1 before the announcement. Sheesh.

]]> By: bagoh20 http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/09/03/so-much-projection/#comment-313736 bagoh20 Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:38:24 +0000 http://www.dinocrat.com/?p=6738#comment-313736 "Why do so many commentators (enthusiastically, instantly) jump to a conclusion when there is so much evidence yet to be considered?" Enthusiastically or desperately, and is there something even faster than instantly? “Why do so many commentators (enthusiastically, instantly) jump to a conclusion when there is so much evidence yet to be considered?”

Enthusiastically or desperately, and is there something even faster than instantly?

]]> By: gs http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/09/03/so-much-projection/#comment-313723 gs Wed, 03 Sep 2008 03:58:36 +0000 http://www.dinocrat.com/?p=6738#comment-313723 I commented:<blockquote>Currently there is no sign of Palin on the convention front page.</blockquote>Thompson's, Lieberman's and Boehner's speeches mentioned her. I commented:
Currently there is no sign of Palin on the convention front page.

Thompson’s, Lieberman’s and Boehner’s speeches mentioned her.

]]> By: gs http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/09/03/so-much-projection/#comment-313720 gs Wed, 03 Sep 2008 02:39:19 +0000 http://www.dinocrat.com/?p=6738#comment-313720 <i>Why do so many commentators (enthusiastically, instantly) jump to a conclusion when there is so much evidence yet to be considered?</i> IMO her enemies want to knock her out before she gets her bearings on the national stage. They have no case for disqualification on the merits, so they have to be fast, sustained, and dirty. Apparently some of the mud is starting to stick. Palin is competitive and a quick study, but she can't learn instantaneously. Since McCain picked her, afaic it became his responsibility to protect her in the early going. ************** <a href="http://www.intrade.com/#" rel="nofollow">Intrade's</a> odds that she'll be withdrawn currently are above 10%. Currently there is no sign of Palin on the convention <a href="http://www.gopconvention2008.com/" rel="nofollow">front page</a>. ************** I was about to donate...and then I remembered 'Read my lips'. Jack's call for restraint is spot on. I trust that my unease is groundless. I trust, but I'll verify. Why do so many commentators (enthusiastically, instantly) jump to a conclusion when there is so much evidence yet to be considered?

IMO her enemies want to knock her out before she gets her bearings on the national stage. They have no case for disqualification on the merits, so they have to be fast, sustained, and dirty. Apparently some of the mud is starting to stick.

Palin is competitive and a quick study, but she can’t learn instantaneously.

Since McCain picked her, afaic it became his responsibility to protect her in the early going.
**************
Intrade’s odds that she’ll be withdrawn currently are above 10%.

Currently there is no sign of Palin on the convention front page.
**************
I was about to donate…and then I remembered ‘Read my lips’.

Jack’s call for restraint is spot on. I trust that my unease is groundless.

I trust, but I’ll verify.

]]>