Sinister plan alert
Frank Rich sees Senator McCain as a man in failing mental and physical health. He thus sees Governor Palin as the real GOP candidate, and he isn’t at all happy about that, noting a “steady unnerving undertone to Palin’s utterances, a consistent message of hubristic self-confidence and hyper-ambition.” His piece is entitled, “Pitbull Palin Mauls McCain.” Excerpt:
Sarah Palin’s post-Couric/Fey comeback at last week’s vice presidential debate was a turning point in the campaign. But if she “won,” as her indulgent partisans and press claque would have it, the loser was not Joe Biden. It was her running mate. With a month to go, the 2008 election is now an Obama-Palin race — about “the future,” as Palin kept saying Thursday night — and the only person who doesn’t seem to know it is Mr. Past, poor old John McCain.
To understand the meaning of Palin’s “victory,” it must be seen in the context of two ominous developments that directly preceded it. Just hours before the debate began, the McCain campaign pulled out of Michigan. That state is ground zero for the collapsed Main Street economy and for so-called Reagan Democrats, those white working-class voters who keep being told by the right that Barack Obama is a Muslim who hung with bomb-throwing radicals during his childhood in the late 1960s.
McCain surrendered Michigan despite having outspent his opponent on television advertising and despite Obama’s twin local handicaps, an unpopular Democratic governor and a felonious, now former, black Democratic Detroit mayor. If McCain can’t make it there, can he make it anywhere in the Rust Belt?
Not without an economic message. McCain’s most persistent attempt, his self-righteous crusade against earmarks, collapsed with his poll numbers. Next to a $700 billion bailout package, his incessant promise to eliminate all Washington pork — by comparison, a puny grand total of $16.5 billion in the 2008 federal budget — doesn’t bring home the bacon. Nor can McCain reconcile his I-will-veto-government-waste mantra with his support, however tardy, of the bailout bill…
It’s against this backdrop that Palin’s public pronouncements, culminating with her debate performance, have been so striking. The standard take has it that she’s either speaking utter ignorant gibberish (as to Couric) or reciting highly polished, campaign-written sound bites that she’s memorized (as at the convention and the debate). But there’s a steady unnerving undertone to Palin’s utterances, a consistent message of hubristic self-confidence and hyper-ambition. She wants to be president, she thinks she can be president, she thinks she will be president. And perhaps soon. She often sounds like someone who sees herself as half-a-heartbeat away from the presidency. Or who is seen that way by her own camp, the hard-right G.O.P. base…
This was first apparent when Palin extolled a “small town” vice president as a hero in her convention speech — and cited not one of the many Republican vice presidents who fit that bill but, bizarrely, Harry Truman, a Democrat who succeeded a president who died in office.
Mr. Rich would appear to be correct about one thing at least. Senator McCain needs a cogent and tightly focused pitch on the economy. His war against earmarks used to be interesting but pretty trivial in dollar terms. Now, with McCain’s vote for the $700 billion bailout, it has become incoherent, and McCain needs to retool his approach. (On the other hand, Sarah Palin’s debate performance on Saturday Night Live was excellent.)

October 6th, 2008 at 6:33 pm
(On the other hand, Sarah Palin’s debate performance on Saturday Night Live was excellent.)
She also took a step forward in the actual debate. Not bad for a small-town mayor who has governed a low-population state for less than two years, i.e. a Not Ready for Prime Time Player.
Then again, Palin has a very long way to go after the debacles with Couric and Gibson. Will she get there in due course? Mickey Kaus (see especially #8) thinks so.