Comments on: A most extraordinary analysis and conclusion http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/10/10/a-most-extraordinary-analysis-and-conclusion/ Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:49:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: dougm http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/10/10/a-most-extraordinary-analysis-and-conclusion/#comment-314218 dougm Sat, 11 Oct 2008 16:30:22 +0000 http://www.dinocrat.com/?p=6847#comment-314218 Staghound: Remember Bernadette Dorhn (Ayers' wife) and Michelle Obama, and eventually Barry all worked at Sidley and Austin's Chicago office in the late 80's, so it is highly likely that Ayers and Barry had a relationship when Barry got the book advance. And Ayers primary goal in becoming an education professor is to infiltrate the system and indoctrinate it with Maxist thought, and Barry represented a wonderfully clean specimen to use as a trojan horse to infect the system. Staghound:

Remember Bernadette Dorhn (Ayers’ wife) and Michelle Obama, and eventually Barry all worked at Sidley and Austin’s Chicago office in the late 80′s, so it is highly likely that Ayers and Barry had a relationship when Barry got the book advance. And Ayers primary goal in becoming an education professor is to infiltrate the system and indoctrinate it with Maxist thought, and Barry represented a wonderfully clean specimen to use as a trojan horse to infect the system.

]]> By: staghounds http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/10/10/a-most-extraordinary-analysis-and-conclusion/#comment-314208 staghounds Sat, 11 Oct 2008 01:50:29 +0000 http://www.dinocrat.com/?p=6847#comment-314208 I find it hard to believe Ayers wrote it, why would he ave done it back then? And it feels authentic to me- very Obama in its me-me-me, everyone is a stand in for some group style. I find it hard to believe Ayers wrote it, why would he ave done it back then?

And it feels authentic to me- very Obama in its me-me-me, everyone is a stand in for some group style.

]]> By: dougm http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/10/10/a-most-extraordinary-analysis-and-conclusion/#comment-314205 dougm Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:30:16 +0000 http://www.dinocrat.com/?p=6847#comment-314205 I've heard Cashill on the radio twice in the past 2 weeks. Present very compelling auguments. Barry O didn't write a paper for the Harvard Law Review when he was president of the publication, I doubt he would have trusted himself to write his own "story". I’ve heard Cashill on the radio twice in the past 2 weeks. Present very compelling auguments.
Barry O didn’t write a paper for the Harvard Law Review when he was president of the publication, I doubt he would have trusted himself to write his own “story”.

]]>