<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An indictment of the media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/10/10/an-indictment-of-the-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/10/10/an-indictment-of-the-media/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:49:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: feeblemind</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/10/10/an-indictment-of-the-media/#comment-314207</link>
		<dc:creator>feeblemind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/?p=6848#comment-314207</guid>
		<description>One wonders if the Ayers, socialist, black nationalism etc isn&#039;t already factored in? Here we have what historically should be a dem year plus the financial markets are melting down on a GOP president. One wonders...... if the dems had chosen a stronger candidate, would they be up 15-20 points right now instead of only about 5?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One wonders if the Ayers, socialist, black nationalism etc isn&#8217;t already factored in? Here we have what historically should be a dem year plus the financial markets are melting down on a GOP president. One wonders&#8230;&#8230; if the dems had chosen a stronger candidate, would they be up 15-20 points right now instead of only about 5?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canucklehead</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/10/10/an-indictment-of-the-media/#comment-314200</link>
		<dc:creator>Canucklehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/?p=6848#comment-314200</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/daily_presidential_tracking_poll&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rasmussen Reports - Daily Presidential Tracking Poll - Friday, October 10, 2008&lt;/a&gt;

...Among voters who consider economic issues to be the most important voting issue, Obama leads 65% to 31%. Among all other voters, McCain leads 60% to 36% (see other recent demographic highlights). It is hard to overstate the impact of the recent economic crisis on Election 2008. Prior to the collapse of Lehman Brothers and the recent Wall Street meltdown, McCain held a very modest lead over Obama nationwide... 

Obama leads 65% to 31% among those who see economic issues as most important, yet McCain leads 60% to 36% among all other voters?  I suspect there is a disconnect in the polling methodology here.  How can you surmise such a large divergent point of view between Americans?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/daily_presidential_tracking_poll" rel="nofollow">Rasmussen Reports &#8211; Daily Presidential Tracking Poll &#8211; Friday, October 10, 2008</a></p>
<p>&#8230;Among voters who consider economic issues to be the most important voting issue, Obama leads 65% to 31%. Among all other voters, McCain leads 60% to 36% (see other recent demographic highlights). It is hard to overstate the impact of the recent economic crisis on Election 2008. Prior to the collapse of Lehman Brothers and the recent Wall Street meltdown, McCain held a very modest lead over Obama nationwide&#8230; </p>
<p>Obama leads 65% to 31% among those who see economic issues as most important, yet McCain leads 60% to 36% among all other voters?  I suspect there is a disconnect in the polling methodology here.  How can you surmise such a large divergent point of view between Americans?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle T</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/10/10/an-indictment-of-the-media/#comment-314197</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/?p=6848#comment-314197</guid>
		<description>DUH!  You are so right!  Why do you think people are so mad!?  They play by the rules and save and pay taxes and now they get royally screwed by the bozos in Washington....rampant looting of our financial institutions and the press sits by quietly being complicit in it.  Our election is now being stolen and again they remain essentially silent!  It is outrageous!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DUH!  You are so right!  Why do you think people are so mad!?  They play by the rules and save and pay taxes and now they get royally screwed by the bozos in Washington&#8230;.rampant looting of our financial institutions and the press sits by quietly being complicit in it.  Our election is now being stolen and again they remain essentially silent!  It is outrageous!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

