<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A much better start than last week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/10/14/a-much-better-start-than-last-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/10/14/a-much-better-start-than-last-week/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: feeblemind</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/10/14/a-much-better-start-than-last-week/#comment-314250</link>
		<dc:creator>feeblemind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/?p=6861#comment-314250</guid>
		<description>Just a dead cat bounce???? We'll see soon enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a dead cat bounce???? We&#8217;ll see soon enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkD</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/10/14/a-much-better-start-than-last-week/#comment-314247</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/?p=6861#comment-314247</guid>
		<description>Maybe the bankers finally figured it out.  If they don't lend money, who needs bankers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the bankers finally figured it out.  If they don&#8217;t lend money, who needs bankers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gs</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2008/10/14/a-much-better-start-than-last-week/#comment-314244</link>
		<dc:creator>gs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/?p=6861#comment-314244</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Of course, it wasn’t until 1954 that the Dow undid the damage that had been done in 1929.&lt;/i&gt;

Not to be pedantic, but it took &lt;a href="http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/charts/chartdl.aspx?PT=11&#38;compsyms=&#38;D4=1&#38;DD=1&#38;D5=0&#38;DCS=2&#38;MA0=0&#38;MA1=0&#38;CP=1&#38;C5=1&#38;C5D=1&#38;C6=1929&#38;C7=12&#38;C7D=15&#38;C8=1954&#38;C9=1&#38;CF=0&#38;D7=&#38;D6=&#38;showchartbt=Redraw+chart&#38;symbol=%24INDU&#38;nocookie=1&#38;SZ=0" rel="nofollow"&gt;almost 3 years&lt;/a&gt; for the October Dow to bottom from its 1929 high.  Come to think of it, I &lt;i&gt;do&lt;/i&gt; hope my point is pedantic with no relation to the immediate future.

It's been too long since I read &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Intelligent_Investor" rel="nofollow"&gt;The Intelligent Investor&lt;/a&gt;, but iirc it states that an investor who began dollar-cost-averaging at the 1929 high would have compounded his money at an annual average of 8% by the time the market returned to the high a quarter-century later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Of course, it wasn’t until 1954 that the Dow undid the damage that had been done in 1929.</i></p>
<p>Not to be pedantic, but it took <a href="http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/charts/chartdl.aspx?PT=11&amp;compsyms=&amp;D4=1&amp;DD=1&amp;D5=0&amp;DCS=2&amp;MA0=0&amp;MA1=0&amp;CP=1&amp;C5=1&amp;C5D=1&amp;C6=1929&amp;C7=12&amp;C7D=15&amp;C8=1954&amp;C9=1&amp;CF=0&amp;D7=&amp;D6=&amp;showchartbt=Redraw+chart&amp;symbol=%24INDU&amp;nocookie=1&amp;SZ=0" rel="nofollow">almost 3 years</a> for the October Dow to bottom from its 1929 high.  Come to think of it, I <i>do</i> hope my point is pedantic with no relation to the immediate future.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been too long since I read <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Intelligent_Investor" rel="nofollow">The Intelligent Investor</a>, but iirc it states that an investor who began dollar-cost-averaging at the 1929 high would have compounded his money at an annual average of 8% by the time the market returned to the high a quarter-century later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
