Where are the Democrat Wise Men when they are needed?

In olden times things were different. David Halberstam opened The Best and the Brightest with a profile of one of the Wise Men of the old Democratic Party, Robert Lovett. Administrations came and went, but there were serious men, keepers of intergenerational wisdom, who provided adult supervision to callow newcomers. From the gross ineptitude of the Obama administration, it would appear that times have changed and the Wise Men have disappeared.

In interpreting Obama’s strange indifference to the stock market’s most recent crash, the choices are not happy ones. Either the man hasn’t a clue about what he is doing, or the market decline suits his purposes (as some have alleged). In either case it is bad news for America.

The really vexing thing is that the economy’s current problems aren’t all that hard to fix, though it is important to do so promptly, so that recovery from this nasty recession can take its normal course. We’ve been through business cycles before, and we’ll go through them again every decade or so. This one is principally unusual in that the Obama administration has dithered instead of fixing the banking system, which has caused unnecessary but serious problems.

The government really only has to do three things in order to let the economy recover as it can: (a) by far the most important task is to stabilize the financial system, which is actually quite easy to do, as history demonstrates; (b) enact a traditional recession stimulus instead of a peculiar boondoggle; and (c) inject some monetary and risk-taking juice into the system by extending the Bush tax cuts for a couple of years (instead of Obama’s extraterrestrial monstrosity of a budget). Some combination of the above have been traditional, bi-partisan medicine in recessions; why not one more time?

In being an effective executive, the number one prerequisite is often figuring out which of all the various elements before us are the important variables to manage. Choosing what to manage is usually the most critical thing of all. In the midst of a recession and financial institution meltdown, Obama has chosen to manage and promote irrelevancies like universal health care and global warming. That he has chosen sideshows rather than critical items bespeaks a man who is either a complete incompetent as an executive, or one who is so cloistered and ideologically blinkered that he can’t see the forest for the trees.

Obama is sometimes compared to FDR, but in a way he’s more like Herbert Hoover. The market crash and recession of 1929 did not have to become the Great Depression. The Depression happened because in the fall of 1930, the authorities started letting banks fail one after another. It was the failure to address this folly on Hoover’s watch that turned a normal business cycle into the Depression (Andrew Jackson had similarly bad judgment during his term.) Obama has that rare opportunity for a President to make a truly catastrophic mistake — and so far he has made the most of it.

It is obvious how to put the country on the road to recovery during this recession, and not very hard to do so. If it is so clear to us, surely it must also be clear to some senior Democrats who have lived a long enough life, studied some history, and have experienced some of the bitter and sweet in the world of commerce and affairs. So where are the Democrat Wise Men at this time when the need for them is critical?

The answer: in the first year of the Obama administration, the wise men have been unheeded on matters domestic and foreign.

5 Responses to “Where are the Democrat Wise Men when they are needed?”

  1. gs Says:

    It is obvious how to put the country on the road to recovery during this recession, and not very hard to do so. If it is so clear to us, surely it must also be clear to some senior Democrats…So where are the Democrat Wise Men at this time when the need for them is critical?

    This assumes that there is still a critical mass of influential people willing to put country before party. There are glimmerings thereof in the media, e.g. Dowd and Krugman (!), but afaik not in the political class.

    For that matter, where were the Republican wise men during the Bush administration?

    As long as Obama has a positive approval rating and as long as the public is primed to blame Bush for Obama’s blunders and as long as the Republicans continue to implode, Obama may feel he has a free hand.

    Of course, if–heaven forbid–the recession continues to deepen and public opinion finally turns on Obama, the only modern comparison would be to post-Watergate. I doubt that Obama sees the danger any more than Nixon did.

  2. David/California Says:

    Actually, Obama seems more like a grown-up Steve Urkel, the scatterbrained geek from television, than he does Herbert Hoover. None of Urkel’s grandiose schemes ever worked out as intended either.

    Sigh… Only 3 years, 10-1/2 months more of Oba-Urkel…

  3. feeblemind Says:

    FWIW: Off the top of my head, I can think of panics in 1785, 1791, 1819, 1837, 1857, 1869, 1873, 1893, and 1907…… and everytime the economy weathered the storm and emerged to grow bigger and better than ever. All without massive intervention from the Federal Government.

  4. gs Says:

    It’s getting around the blogosphere (around the MSM, not so much) that Democrat and Obama supporter Warren Buffett didn’t mince words when he spoke out on Monday.

  5. Han Says:

    A real leader has the ability to review a situation and determine the 2 or 3 critical issues which, if corrected, will alter the current course of events. President Obama seems to be one of those unique individuals who can talk about what to do, but they never actually accomplish anything. In my early career when management brought in one of these Harvard educated “geeks”, we would just keep our heads down and try to survive until he or she moved on.

    My current profession is to turn around businesses. I have done this for the past 1.5 decades outside of the USA. I have seen many resumes (CV’s) from people like Obama. They have great potential, but have accomplished nothing. I rarely hire people like Obama. All I can say is “200 more weeks”!

    Perhaps Obama will develop his potential into real leadership ability. His recent understanding that what he says does impact the economy, is an indication that he is learning on the job. Your article is really on point. The Democratic party needs to partner someone (other than Biden) with this guy and guide him as he learns on the job!

    Han

Leave a Reply