The NYT opines on bowing
An article in the NYT from 1994:
“If I see another king, I think I shall bite him,” Teddy Roosevelt once growled. Offered that opportunity with the Japanese equivalent last week, Bill Clinton turned out to have had quite something else in mind.
It wasn’t a bow, exactly. But Mr. Clinton came close. He inclined his head and shoulders forward, he pressed his hands together. It lasted no longer than a snapshot, but the image on the South Lawn was indelible: an obsequent President, and the Emperor of Japan.
Canadians still bow to England’s Queen; so do Australians. Americans shake hands. If not to stand eye-to-eye with royalty, what else were 1776 and all that about?…the “thou need not bow” commandment from the State Department’s protocol office maintained a constancy of more than 200 years. Administration officials scurried to insist that the eager-to-please President had not really done the unthinkable.
Of course the NYT was far too busy this year to notice the obsequent behavior of the current President in his meeting with the Saudi king. And on the matter of the President’s visit to Japan — no comment on the bow, but the Times did mention Obama’s weird comment about Japan’s “prominent role in Afghanistan.”

November 15th, 2009 at 10:43 am
…You just gotta think that the Japanese are wondering why they didn’t wait 68 years and just ask this asskisser for Hawaii. I suspect he’d give it to them.