<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s nice when left and right can agree</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2009/12/24/its-nice-when-left-and-right-can-agree/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2009/12/24/its-nice-when-left-and-right-can-agree/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:49:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kalashnikat</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2009/12/24/its-nice-when-left-and-right-can-agree/#comment-341045</link>
		<dc:creator>Kalashnikat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/?p=13608#comment-341045</guid>
		<description>Save the planet from global cooling!...start discharging Freon again, or we&#039;ll all freeze!

Sorry, but as I watch the snow piling up and read about poor folks in britain burning obsolete books to keep warm, I could wish for a bit of global warming right now.   We still have a spotless sun, which generally indicates a cold period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Save the planet from global cooling!&#8230;start discharging Freon again, or we&#8217;ll all freeze!</p>
<p>Sorry, but as I watch the snow piling up and read about poor folks in britain burning obsolete books to keep warm, I could wish for a bit of global warming right now.   We still have a spotless sun, which generally indicates a cold period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill</title>
		<link>http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2009/12/24/its-nice-when-left-and-right-can-agree/#comment-339714</link>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 14:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dinocrat.com/?p=13608#comment-339714</guid>
		<description>That &quot;False Greenhouse Science&quot; paper costs $25, but the abstract is interesting.

&quot;The atmospheric greenhouse effect, an idea that many authors trace back to the traditional works of Fourier (1824), Tyndall (1861), and Arrhenius (1896), and which is still supported in global climatology, essentially describes a fictitious mechanism, in which a planetary atmosphere acts as a heat pump driven by an environment that is radiatively interacting with but radiatively equilibrated to the atmospheric system. According to the second law of thermodynamics, such a planetary machine can never exist. Nevertheless, in almost all texts of global climatology and in a widespread secondary literature, it is taken for granted that such a mechanism is real and stands on a firm scientific foundation.&quot;

It goes on to list a series of AGW conjectures which the paper will show are wrong wrong wrong.

It is alarming how far into the science journals the &quot;settled science scam&quot; of AGW penetrated, and even more alarming how its exposure is being ignored by our heads of state.  This is a (not all that stealthy) attack on our economy, that could have more dire consequences than 9/11, yet our dear leaders are still denying an attack has occurred, as if our scientific community has not been infiltrated.

Obama denies there is any question about AGW, he denies he pushing toward &quot;single payer&quot; (BigGov health care), and he denies he heard Rev. Wright say any of those controversial things over his 20 year relationship with the man.  

Deny Deny Deny .... our Denier in chief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That &#8220;False Greenhouse Science&#8221; paper costs $25, but the abstract is interesting.</p>
<p>&#8220;The atmospheric greenhouse effect, an idea that many authors trace back to the traditional works of Fourier (1824), Tyndall (1861), and Arrhenius (1896), and which is still supported in global climatology, essentially describes a fictitious mechanism, in which a planetary atmosphere acts as a heat pump driven by an environment that is radiatively interacting with but radiatively equilibrated to the atmospheric system. According to the second law of thermodynamics, such a planetary machine can never exist. Nevertheless, in almost all texts of global climatology and in a widespread secondary literature, it is taken for granted that such a mechanism is real and stands on a firm scientific foundation.&#8221;</p>
<p>It goes on to list a series of AGW conjectures which the paper will show are wrong wrong wrong.</p>
<p>It is alarming how far into the science journals the &#8220;settled science scam&#8221; of AGW penetrated, and even more alarming how its exposure is being ignored by our heads of state.  This is a (not all that stealthy) attack on our economy, that could have more dire consequences than 9/11, yet our dear leaders are still denying an attack has occurred, as if our scientific community has not been infiltrated.</p>
<p>Obama denies there is any question about AGW, he denies he pushing toward &#8220;single payer&#8221; (BigGov health care), and he denies he heard Rev. Wright say any of those controversial things over his 20 year relationship with the man.  </p>
<p>Deny Deny Deny &#8230;. our Denier in chief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

