A liberal is not amused

Jack Cafferty was not pleased with the response of the Obama administration to Arizona’s immigration law, which is supported by 70% of voters versus 23% who oppose it:

Arizona passes a tough law against illegal immigration and suddenly they’ve got Washington’s attention. One poll finds 70 percent of Arizona voters support this new law, so hey, maybe we better do something, too…President Obama called the Arizona law misguided. What’s misguided, Mr. President, is the federal government’s ongoing refusal to enforce the laws that are already on the books.

Read the Arizona law. Parts of it are word-for-word the same as the federal statutes which continue to be all but ignored. Now we’re hear all sorts of blathering from our Washington gerbils about the need for a new federal law. There’ll be news conferences and interviews and committee hearings and draft legislation and polling, all the usual carnival acts that accompany any hot button Washington issue.

Instead of simply closing the borders and enforcing the existing law so they could turn their attention to something like the national debt and the fact that the country is bankrupt, instead we’re going to get this freak show. Washington’s position on illegal immigration is patently dishonest from the top down. No enforcement, no border security. Just pandering to the Hispanic voters and the corporations that hire the illegals. And then, when one of our states that’s being ravaged by the presence of 460,000 illegal aliens inside its borders does something about it, the President says that’s misguided. What a shame.

Rich Lowry discusses more of the negative reactions to the Arizona statute: “The Arizona law makes it a state crime for aliens not to have immigration documents on their person. This sounds draconian, except it’s been a federal crime for more than half a century — U.S.C. 1304(e).” (AT notes that the Mexican drug cartels now control the trails into Arizona and that the crime problem had become acute, but the Feds did little or nothing to enforce existing law.)

2 Responses to “A liberal is not amused”

  1. F Says:

    Mr President, this sounds to me like another “teachable moment.” How about another beer summit? Seriously, though, I just saw that AG Holder might be planning to try for an injunction against the Arizona law. How will that look: the USG is going to enjoin a state from enforcing a law on the Federal books? Bring on the effing clowns. I cannot believe what this administration has become. F

  2. Maggie's Farm Says:

    Weds. mid-day links…

    City Journal: Preservation Follies – Excessive landmarking threatens to make Manhattan a refuge for the rich.
    NASA doubts climate model certainty
    BBC: Climate party is winding down
    Competition for The Teaching Company: Free Yale into courses o…

Leave a Reply