“Prosecutorial discretion”

Immigration, 2011:

“I just have to continue to say this notion that somehow I can just change the laws unilaterally is just not true. We are doing everything we can administratively. But the fact of the matter is there are laws on the books that I have to enforce. And I think there’s been a great disservice done to the cause of getting the DREAM Act passed and getting comprehensive immigration passed by perpetrating the notion that somehow, by myself, I can go and do these things. It’s just not true.”

Immigration, 2012:

“both parties wrote this legislation, and year and a half ago, Democrats passed the Dream Act in the House, but Republicans walked away from it. It got 55 votes in the Senate, but Republicans blocked it. The bill hasn’t really changed; the need hasn’t changed. It’s still the right thing to do…We focus and use discretion about whom to prosecute, focusing on criminals who endanger our communities rather than students who are earning their education.”

Pot, early 2012:

“We’re not going to have legalized weed anytime soon…I can’t ask the Justice Department to say, ‘Ignore completely a federal law that’s on the books. What I can say is, ‘Use your prosecutorial discretion”

Question: will prosecutorial discretion regarding marijuana “evolve” prior to November?

One Response to ““Prosecutorial discretion””

  1. feeblemind Says:

    I don’t see legalizing weed to be a net plus for 0bama. He continues to light fires and gets burned by the blowback. Polls continue to show Americans support the war on drugs. Like support for gay marriage it is likely to do more harm than good IMO.

Leave a Reply